SOLD Defiance Tenacity Action - For Sale NEW

Status
Not open for further replies.

dcogan@360Precision

360 Precision
Supporter
Commercial Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 11, 2019
250
76
Warminster, PA
www.360precision.com
Specifications
  • Receiver made of pre-hardened aircraft-certified 416 stainless steel with integral recoil lug.
  • Bolt made of pre-hardened aircraft-certified 4340 chrome moly with recessed bolt lugs, utilizing a mini-16 extractor and plunger ejector.
  • Receiver barrel threads are 1.0625” X 16 T.P.I. (Rem. 700 thread dia. and pitch)
  • Integral recoil lug included
  • Action: Medium (Rem. SA) .480” bolt face
  • Right Hand
  • DBM mag cut works with detachable magazines either AICS/AW
Options
• Right Hand
• Bolt Face: .308 Rem (.480)
• Magazine Cut: DBM

SALE PRICE: $895
The rifle must ship to FFL or be picked up at our shop located in Warminster, PA. Sales Tax for PA residents only.
 

Attachments

  • Tenacity-001.jpg
    Tenacity-001.jpg
    547.3 KB · Views: 170
  • Tenacity-004.jpg
    Tenacity-004.jpg
    164.8 KB · Views: 173
  • Tenacity-003.jpg
    Tenacity-003.jpg
    154.8 KB · Views: 164
  • Tenacity-002.jpg
    Tenacity-002.jpg
    173.1 KB · Views: 170
It's shitty that a commercial supporter of the site posts a rare in-stock action for almost half off current MSRP and sells it to the first person who meets his terms...after directly notifying an interested party of the terms? That sounds more like a generous gift to one lucky (and proactive) forum member from a guy who has already donated tens of thousands of dollars and countless hours to the shooting community.
 
That’s true if the person was messaged privately and didn’t meet the terms. If it happened how it looks in this thread-1)posting a wts ad
2)person responds
3)buying info posted publicly instead of privately (presumably)
4)someone buys out from under the first “I’ll take it”
then yes, that is crappy business no matter who you are or how much you donate.
 
Maybe there should not be bad mouthing of a supporting vendor based upon presumption in the absence of the whole story? The dib is an expression of interest, not a contract or completed transaction. Money talks. The terms were clearly spelled out in post 4 while the action was still available. It appears that someone else met them.

Read the site rules and guidelines. Neither party is obligated to complete transaction. Don't crap in for sale threads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kleinotter
It's shitty that a commercial supporter of the site posts a rare in-stock action for almost half off current MSRP and sells it to the first person who meets his terms...after directly notifying an interested party of the terms? That sounds more like a generous gift to one lucky (and proactive) forum member from a guy who has already donated tens of thousands of dollars and countless hours to the shooting community.
sounds like we found the guy who stole mcc308s action hahaha.
 
He said "we have multiple people asking for this.". So the question is, how was priority determined? If mcc308 was the very first person to state they were interested and planned to buy it, it's only reasonable to give the man some time to make the purchase. 3 hours later and it's gone seems ridiculous to me. If there was a PM sent to the seller before mcc308 posted in this thread that he wanted it, I understand. Outside of that, don't get someone's hopes up just to sell something out from underneath them. Am I wrong in saying that the buy/sell portion of this message board operates as the first person to post they will buy an item gets the chance to actually buy the item unless they prove they can not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcc308 and Whhood
If he was going to sell the action to the first person who who called the shop, then he should have put that in the original post with his contact info. But he didn’t. Within hours of posting, someone claims via the post. Around here that’s how it’s done. Then all of a sudden he’s still accepting all offers but you have to call.

It’s just sloppy and clearly doesn’t go over well with doing business.
 
Maybe there should not be bad mouthing of a supporting vendor based upon presumption in the absence of the whole story? The dib is an expression of interest, not a contract or completed transaction. Money talks. The terms were clearly spelled out in post 4 while the action was still available. It appears that someone else met them.

Read the site rules and guidelines. Neither party is obligated to complete transaction. Don't crap in for sale threads.
No one is saying it’s against the rules, just in bad taste. There’s written site rules and then unwritten px etiquette. He was fine by one and not the other. The item is sold so it really isn’t crapping on the thread as it will have no impact on this sale, but you’re high if you don’t think people will remember this next time he posts something here. Could have been easily avoided by stating his terms off the bat, or a simple “this is posted for sale elsewhere and first to call or show up to my shop gets it.” The op likely could care less but as a business owner he’s getting some free feedback 🤷‍♂️ Technically he could have accepted a better offer, which still would be within rules, but in bad taste regardless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.