Re: Do Police Snipers Use Duplex Reticles?
The short answer is: Yes, I have seen many departments use duplex reticles.
The longer answer is that one-inch tube Leupy variables with no exernal knobs and a duplex reticle are common among departments that either don't understand, or don't properly fund, their sniper (in this case more accurately called 'perimeter') teams.
It's usually the result of either a purchasing decision by someone who doesn't know any better, or making-do with outdated equipment and a limited budget.
I have seen duplex reticles used to varying degrees of success at short range. Because many so-called 'tactical teams' don't have, and don't know how to use, a Mil dot reticle. The training of these teams varies between being told in-house to simply 'zero a bit high at 100 than aim dead-on after that' [no kidding], and being taught how to zero properly at 100 but 'memorize your hold-over' for longer ranges.
Most officers make do with what they have. Some get good with bad equipment. Enthusiasts buy their own affordable upgrades. Hopeless romantics destroy their careers by pushing too hard to change the system.
Twenty years ago it was different, but these days there's no excuse, in budget or training, not to have - at minimum - a Mil dot reticle. I would argue (and have argued) that not knowing how to range targets, and not equipping and training officers in the use of a device to accomplish this task, is negligence on its face. Regardless, many administrators either don't know this, don't care, or both. After all, when they have to pay-out it's not their money.
To answer your personal question: get a Mil dot and spend the time and money to learn how to use it. It will make you a better shooter and a better hunter. There are many cheap, relatively durable Mil dot scope on the market now. The Bushell is good. The Super Sniper is good. Others work well, too. If you're serious, sell the Leupy and go learn something.