@StrayDog
I do trust the bullet, but I want to be able to predict future bullets, which requires an accurate ballistics curve.
I have chronographed both setups...but in different conditions with different chronographs. For the Vudoo, which is the one I care about most at this point, I used a Labradar with an external mic trigger three days ago. I used a Chrony last summer to chronograph the Kidd. The Vudoo was 1071fps on average and the Kidd was in the high 1050s. The Labradar sits right next to the muzzle and measures muzzle velocity. The Chrony sits down range of the rifle and doesn't measure the true muzzle velocity, which accounts for some of the difference.
@nesikabay
My 25 yard zero is effectively zeroed at 50 yards as well, so it sounds like our trajectories are similar. What do you use for ballistics calculations?
@padom
I care; that's why I'm asking. I did zero it, and have been shooting it. When I shoot it in the future, I'd like to be able to predict the drop at various ranges, so I can hit my target.
@hlee
I don't think it would be scope height. The ballistics apps take that into account. And I used the same rings on both, so the height was nearly identical.
@Tiger_Shilone
Unless the case leaves the chamber before the bullet leaves the muzzle, the reciprocating bolt shouldn't have much effect on the muzzle velocity. The gas pressure is pushing the Vudoo bolt with just as much force as the Kidd bolt, but in the case of the Vudoo, the entire rifle absorbs that force, because the bolt is locked to the action.
If the case leaves the chamber early, or ruptures, the gas will be able to escape via the chamber, and will stop applying force to the bullet.
Ignoring the Kidd though...with two different ballistics apps, I get elevation data for the Vudoo that is significantly different than what I observe. That's what I'm trying to figure out.
Should I make up a muzzle velocity that fits my prediction? Or would that likely be incorrect at other distances?