Well, I bought into the hype about H4350 a while back. 'Extreme,' they said. Loaded up my .260 with 42.8gr sending a 139 Scenar at 2850 fps downrange this weekend yielded four blown primers and cost me one ejector spring. This is a load that worked well in other climates but apparently due to temperature this was now too 'hot.'
Wasn't just me. Two other guys at the range down here in Florida had stuck ejectors with the same powder in loads they were typically OK with.
A while back I bought IMR 4350 for my 6.5 Creedmoor. I found it to be a good bit MORE accurate than H4350 in a good bit of temperatures. Buddy of mine shot his 6.5 CM this weekend and no pressure issues with IMR 4350. Not sure why IMR is outperforming H4350 in at least 4 different guns that we've tried it in when it's much easier to find and cheaper, let alone not 'extreme.'
I don't think it has to do with the extruding, as another .260 I shot with Varget and 130 Bergers shot a sub 2" 5 shot group at 600 yards with a custom savage. Maybe the H4350 had some QC issues when the demand was as extreme as the powder is supposed to be.
But again, I'm going back with IMR.
Any others here experience this?
Wasn't just me. Two other guys at the range down here in Florida had stuck ejectors with the same powder in loads they were typically OK with.
A while back I bought IMR 4350 for my 6.5 Creedmoor. I found it to be a good bit MORE accurate than H4350 in a good bit of temperatures. Buddy of mine shot his 6.5 CM this weekend and no pressure issues with IMR 4350. Not sure why IMR is outperforming H4350 in at least 4 different guns that we've tried it in when it's much easier to find and cheaper, let alone not 'extreme.'
I don't think it has to do with the extruding, as another .260 I shot with Varget and 130 Bergers shot a sub 2" 5 shot group at 600 yards with a custom savage. Maybe the H4350 had some QC issues when the demand was as extreme as the powder is supposed to be.
But again, I'm going back with IMR.
Any others here experience this?