Re: DPMS LR-260
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Casey Simpson</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A PRS accomplishes 0.
If weight in the butt is the goal you can get that for $30.00.
If higher cheek weld is the goal use the right ring height. For me its a high.
If butt length is at issue adjust move scope forward in the rings, or use an extended riser, or an adjustable butt that cost only $125.00.
Prone requires your cheek to be forward and either OFF or precariously off/on the clever little cheek riser of the PRS. Bad! Then you have to adjust the butt out. With an A2 stock, simply move the scope forward.
I used a PRS. Its a gimmick - sent that thing down the road. I know some like them. They don't realize a better result is accomlished a better way.
A PRS looks nifty, snipery, smart, but its expensive, heavy, throws the gun off balance,..........etc.
</div></div>
for the riser, lower rings wont help if your scope has a larger odjective lense. i have a 50MM objective in med rings with a riser, and it is just a hair off of the HG. i do need just a little bit of rise to line up right.
the "butt length adjustment" is not for moving your eye in relation to the scope, its adjusting the length of pull(distance between the trigger and your shoulder) the proper LOP on your rifle is determaned by the length of your arms.
also(at least for my REPR) the PRS very nicely balanced the 24" SST bull bbl and it lets me shoot off hand at running game quite comfertably.
yes, there are several ways that you can get the same results, the PRS just happens to be one of them.