Expander Mandrel

Whats your neck tension mandrel of choice?

  • 21st Century turning arbor

    Votes: 19 29.7%

  • 21 Century caliber specific mandrel kit (0.0005 increments)

    Votes: 25 39.1%

  • Something else (please comment what)

    Votes: 17 26.6%

  • Adding an extra step (using mandrels) didnt make a difference on target

    Votes: 3 4.7%
  • Total voters
    64
F

FNG1001

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 5, 2022
431
181
USA
#1
Been reading a lot about expander mandrels and, particularly, the use of 21st Century expander mandrel (0.001 below bullet diameter) and turning arbor (0.002 below bullet diameter) over the range of mandrels they offer, differing in 0.0005 in size. I current Forster FL resizing dies for all my reloading.

How many of you use the turning arbor, or expander mandrel, instead of going down the route of setting neck tension using the the caliber specific expander mandrel kits? I found some chatter about this in light discussions from thread a few years ago, but thought I would ask in a dedicated thread.

References:
0.002 Turning Arbor: https://21stcenturyinnovation.com/buy-online/ols/products/black-nitride-turning-arbor
Caliber Specific Mandrel Kit: https://21stcenturyinnovation.com/buy-online/ols/products/caliber-specific-expander-mandrel
 
  • Like
Reactions: 338dude
#3
Turning arbors
BD6C558E-FC26-40C4-8E87-5B5512A9B29F.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: acudaowner and FNG1001
#5
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CarlM, FNG1001 and MediumSpeed
#7
Sinclair mandrel die and whatever turning mandrel (-.002) I have (stainless, carbide, etc). If I’m playing with lighter neck tension, I’ll use an “expander mandrel” (-.001).
 
  • Like
Reactions: FNG1001
#8
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
#12
spife7980 said:
Turning arbors
View attachment 8147797
Click to expand...

Are those the black nitride or titanium nitride? How has your experience and results been? I have their GenX expander die, and black nitride turning arbor for 6.5 (to solve a difference problem). I am leaning toward getting the remaining turning arbors in the calibers I'm interested in, mostly due to my positive experiences with them so far and my preference for keeping things the same (not jumping around too many manufacturers) unless another product is greatly superior.
 
#13
FNG1001 said:
Are those the black nitride or titanium nitride? How has your experience and results been? I have their GenX expander die, and black nitride turning arbor for 6.5 (to solve a difference problem). I am leaning toward getting the remaining turning arbors in the calibers I'm interested in, mostly due to my positive experiences with them so far and my preference for keeping things the same (not jumping around too many manufacturers) unless another product is greatly superior.
Click to expand...
Steel and TiN
E2CB5586-FA58-4629-ACEC-B1D9F7BE6150.jpeg
 
Last edited:
#14
Maybe ask @OREGUN, since it sounds like he has all the different types... but I'm not sure what the arbors are made out of, or what they are coated in, matters that much.

I chamfer after the cases get run through the mandrel, so IDK if there would be any difference in the final product whether using carbide, TiNI, BlackNi, or plain steel ones...
 
#15
CK1.0 said:
Maybe ask @OREGUN, since it sounds like he has all the different types... but I'm not sure what the arbors are made out of, or what they are coated in, matters that much.

I chamfer after the cases get run through the mandrel, so IDK if there would be any difference in the final product whether using carbide, TiNI, BlackNi, or plain steel ones...
Click to expand...
I have several regular old stainless and one that was sold as ”carbide”. I use a dab of imperial die wax on all of them prior to starting and a touch on a q-tip in the case mouth as well. Can’t tell the difference. The 6mm (.241”) one is stainless and got ~5000 cycles a year for 3 ish years prior to switching to a mandrelling sizer. It has visible wear but I’ve never measured it. The others, far fewer cycles, no wear. I decided to keep buying cheaper stainless ones for most calibers as I think they’d provide a lifetime of use at a few hundred cycles a year. Never had any galling or other issues.

I dry tumble, anneal, size/decap, mandrel, trim/chamfer. So my necks have carbon in them when I mandrel and all case mouth operations (trim, chamfer, deburr) happen last in the brass prep process.

I load for <1/2” groups and <10 SD. It’s more precise than is required for PRS but not as tedious as the benchrest guys get. My entire goal is to get there in the fewest number of touches as possible. I hate reloading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gray shooter, mavericks95, SporterII and 2 others
#16
Sinclair mandrell - 0.002 for each caliber.

I have set the expander buttons in each fls die to yield 0.004 - 0.006 under. I believe this way the brass is worked with less stress.

I have seen up to a 20% reduction in group size accross the board.
Also in the case of 223 range brass it seems that my loads transfer to different brass with less variance.

Everything including plinkers gets the extra step. You can just shove the targets farther out.
 
#17
FNG1001 said:
Been reading a lot about expander mandrels and, particularly, the use of 21st Century expander mandrel (0.001 below bullet diameter) and turning arbor (0.002 below bullet diameter) over the range of mandrels they offer, differing in 0.0005 in size. I current Forster FL resizing dies for all my reloading.

How many of you use the turning arbor, or expander mandrel, instead of going down the route of setting neck tension using the the caliber specific expander mandrel kits? I found some chatter about this in light discussions from thread a few years ago, but thought I would ask in a dedicated thread.

References:
0.002 Turning Arbor: https://21stcenturyinnovation.com/buy-online/ols/products/black-nitride-turning-arbor
Caliber Specific Mandrel Kit: https://21stcenturyinnovation.com/buy-online/ols/products/caliber-specific-expander-mandrel
Click to expand...
I went with the kit for 6.5 manbun and I'm glad I did. With spring back, just picking a mandrel that "should" have given me .002" interference fit actually did not and I was glad that I could step thru the kit to find one that did.

Just me and I just recently bought this kit and am using mandrels for the first time...so I don't know that I'll get superior performance from using it but it damn sure satisfied my OCD tendencies! hahaha
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: FNG1001 and R_A_W
#19
Baron23 said:
I went with the kit for 6.5 manbun and I'm glad I did. With spring back, just picking a mandrel that "should" have given me .002" interference fit actually did not and I was glad that I could step thru the kit to find one that did.

Just me and I just recently bought this kit and am using mandrels for the first time...so I don't know that I'll get superior performance from using it but it damn sure satisfied my OCD tendencies! hahaha
Click to expand...
Did you get the whole kit, or picked from it? Which of the sized mandrels do you use the most? They have a great range.
 
#20
I've mostly used the Sinclair steel expander mandrels, measured 0.001" under bullet diameter. However, I've recently started using SAC neck bushings in a Redding Type S die and the concentricity is incredible, so I started skipping the mandrel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
#22
FNG1001 said:
Did you get the whole kit, or picked from it? Which of the sized mandrels do you use the most? They have a great range.
Click to expand...
I just got the kit so as to not have to dick with ordering another as the neck brass gets a bit thinner with use. Ah....later I'll have to look and see if I still have the one I used last still in the die. I'm shooting Berger 140 hybrid targets and they are .2635 on the bearing surface. So, I do remember the first time I used them I immediately went to the .2615 mandrel and found the necks were still too tight (spring back, yeah? And, they all were annealed with an AMP). I just stepped up in the mandrel kit until I got the .2615 I wanted.

I know, not much help and I doubt I'll use most of the mandrels in the kit, but I'm covered for what I need. Did the same with Vermont Gage's pin gauges that I bought from Travers Tool. Every .0005 over a pretty good range. They are like $4 each. I'm just that way...prob why I'm broke! ;-) haha
 
#24
Baron23 said:
6.5 manbun
Click to expand...

Not to get sidetracked lol...

But personally, I hate hearing/reading "6.5 man bun". It's cringy, and to me, it seems like a kowtow to all the rifle goofballs who think they are somehow cooler than other guys because they shoot some wildcat (usually Dasher/BR or another case that requires mag kits that fuck up every match even though they continue to say/post "mine runs 100%"). :ROFLMAO:

The 6.5 Creedmoor changed the game, and probably more so than any other case, is responsible for the growth of the long-range shooting scene. Yeah, a lot of guys new to the sport shoot it... but so do guys like Morgun King, arguably the best guy out there.

IMO, it's still the best choice for a shit ton of guys out there, and I don't like it when wannabe rifle guru guys put it down just for being ubiquitous. I don't even have one, but I kind of want to get one due to all the shade that gets thrown at it since it's not cool enough.

Honestly, when someone says they shoot Dasher/BR/BRA/BRX or something like that, it's hard not to think "Here we go, another smarty-pants". :rolleyes:

End tirade.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Malum Prohibitum, Gray shooter, stevieb92 and 3 others
#25
CK1.0 said:
Not to get sidetracked lol...

But personally, I hate hearing/reading "6.5 man bun". It's cringy, and to me, it seems like a kowtow to all the rifle goofballs who think they are somehow cooler than other guys because they shoot some wildcat (usually Dasher/BR or another case that requires mag kits that fuck up every match even though they continue to say/post "mine runs 100%"). :ROFLMAO:

The 6.5 Creedmoor changed the game, and probably more so than any other case, is responsible for the growth of the long-range shooting scene. Yeah, a lot of guys new to the sport shoot it... but so do guys like Morgun King, arguably the best guy out there.

IMO, it's still the best choice for a shit ton of guys out there, and I don't like it when wannabe rifle guru guys put it down just for being ubiquitous. I don't even have one, but I kind of want to get one due to all the shade that gets thrown at it since it's not cool enough.

Honestly, when someone says they shoot Dasher/BR/BRA/BRX or something like that, it's hard not to think "Here we go, another smarty-pants". :rolleyes:

End tirade.
Click to expand...
TL;DR: CK1 says using the phrase man bun is small dick energy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taylorbok, Baron23 and CK1.0
#26
CK1.0 said:
"6.5 man bun"
Click to expand...
Oh for fuck sake....when I got on this forum I was beat over the head with man bun, man bun, man bun ever time 6.5 CR comes up.

So not often, but sometimes in a whimsical mood I'll pop it out. Please don't triggered about it and take it up with your Iron Drum therapy group ;-) haha

CK1.0 said:
wannabe rifle guru guys put it down just for being ubiquitous.
Click to expand...
And I'm neither a wannabe anything and def don't try to pass myself off as a rifle guru. Its the caliber I shoot in my two precision rilfes.

See above about avoiding triggering! ;-) haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
#27
Baron23 said:
Oh for fuck sake....when I got on this forum I was beat over the head with man bun, man bun, man bun ever time 6.5 CR comes up.

So not often, but sometimes in a whimsical mood I'll pop it out. Please don't triggered about it and take it up with your Iron Drum therapy group ;-) haha


And I'm neither a wannabe anything and def don't try to pass myself off as a rifle guru. Its the caliber I shoot in my two precision rilfes.

See above about avoiding triggering! ;-) haha
Click to expand...

I wasn’t coming at you, sorry if it seemed as though I was…

And I’m not triggered lol, I just don’t think guys should have to make a joke or apologize for shooting a case that is honestly probably the right choice for a lot of guys.

I might have been over sharing something that has been bothering me is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FNG1001 and Baron23
#28
CK1.0 said:
I wasn’t coming at you, sorry if it seemed as though I was…

And I’m not triggered lol, I just don’t think guys should have to make a joke or apologize for shooting a case that is honestly probably the right choice for a lot of guys.

I might have been over sharing something that has been bothering me is all.
Click to expand...
Haha…no problem at all, my friend. All good :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: FNG1001 and CK1.0
#29
ForgeValley said:
6.5 Creedmoor is an excellent, practical cartridge that actually has application to the real world outside of PRS. As gaming and gamers have taken over PRS, so have gaming cartridges.

Sorry for contributing to the thread drift, I've been here long enough to know most the guys that throw out the manbun moniker were sucking 6.5 Creedmoors dick 5-6 years ago when it was all the PRS hotness. Irks the shit out of me. The cartridges didn't change, the guys that shoot them have, and honestly I see more manbuns around the PRS scene now than ever before. That and Subarus.
Click to expand...
If we are going to call 65CM a gamer cartridge, my question is, have you met the 6 dasher?


Honestly, I don’t feel like there is a “gamer” anything. The point is to make the plate go “ding” more than the other guy. Whatever gets there wins.

At least a 6.5 can kill an elk.
 
#30
I've had good luck with the stainless from 21st century. I skipped the kit and just ordered the individual mandrels .002" under bullet diameter for their respective cartridges, it's like $25 per caliber vs $175.

I'd like to try the nitride or carbide but I haven't had the need. I also spray lube in the necks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23
#31
I eliminated the mandrel step from my process and haven’t looked back. I use a Redding Type-S die with no expander, and picked a S.A.C. bushing that gave me the same ID as I was getting with my mandrel, and my groups are just as tight as ever.
When I was using mandrels, the 21st Century black nitride we the slickest.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: moaorbust, BuildingConceptsllc and Schütze
#33
To get back on track a little, IMO the turning arbors (-.002" bullet OD) are probably a safe bet for most people, but if one wants to try some other sizes/ODs, no reason not to other than money.

That said, there's a lot of variation one can experiment with just by having one turning arbor/mandrel... as far as what neck tension/bullet grip they get... it will change by what size their FL die is honed to and/or depending on what size bushing one uses.

It's hard to quantify... just know that if you follow a .269" bushing with a .241" turning arbor/mandrel you'll get a different result than you would with a .266" bushing followed by the same .241" turning arbor/mandrel if that makes sense...

These days in 6mm I prefer what I get using a .266" honed die vs something larger, maybe over-squashing the case mouth/neck a bit (I anneal every firing so who cares) and I feel like the mandrel engages the cases a little more and I end up with a slightly more consistent result.

And besides, after noticing how much case mouths actually get fucked with when tumbling off the lube after sizing, I'll be sticking with the mandrel if only just for fixing that post-tumble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lou400a and Herb Stoner
#35
IMO using a mandrel is better than not using one for a couple of big reasons, besides the obvious concentricity and neck tension reasons often cited.

First, using the mandrel to push any irregularities to the outside of the neck makes seating bullets more consistent/repeatable, it just does, and that may lead to a more consistent/repeatable BC (and with fancy bullets every little bit helps, BC is expensive these days).

Secondly, as I mentioned above, if one tumbles the lube off their cases after sizing, they're messing up their case mouths/necks probably way more than they know... and hitting the mandrel before seating bullets fixes the damage.

In the end, there are other reloading processes that I do that I loathe way more than the mandrel step, the mandrel step is quick and easy so there's almost no good reason to not do it IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp, Lthrt, Doghed and 1 other person
#36
CK1.0 said:
These days in 6mm I prefer what I get using a .266" honed die vs something larger, maybe over-squashing the case mouth/neck a bit (I anneal every firing so who cares) and I feel like the mandrel engages the cases a little more and I end up with a slightly more consistent result.
Click to expand...

I one hundred percent agree with this. For a while now, I’ve been sizing the neck down smaller than most people. I want the mandrel to positively size the neck up…not to just barely kiss the neck walls because I’m not sizing down very much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doghed
#37
OREGUN said:
I one hundred percent agree with this. For a while now, I’ve been sizing the neck down smaller than most people. I want the mandrel to positively size the neck up…not to just barely kiss the neck walls because I’m not sizing down very much.
Click to expand...

Yeah, in 6mm I used a .268" or .269" bushing for a long time before hitting the mandrel, and it was ok, the mandrel would just barely touch the cases, and to a certain extent I could maybe see why one might go back to a bushing-only because maybe they weren't seeing much difference with the mandrel.

But since going to a smaller bushing in order to get the amount of engagement I was looking for (so it didn't require too much effort, but I could definitely feel at the handle that the mandrel was really opening the necks back up), I have definitely noticed a difference for the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Herb Stoner
#39
CK1.0 said:
Yeah, in 6mm I used a .268" or .269" bushing for a long time before hitting the mandrel, and it was ok, the mandrel would just barely touch the cases, and to a certain extent I could maybe see why one might go back to a bushing-only because maybe they weren't seeing much difference with the mandrel.

But since going to a smaller bushing in order to get the amount of engagement I was looking for (so it didn't require too much effort, but I could definitely feel at the handle that the mandrel was really opening the necks back up), I have definitely noticed a difference for the better.
Click to expand...
I made this move recently based on input I received here and, at least early on, its showing some improvement in concentricity and SD. I’m using SAC Modular dies and Porters Precision gage pins. Annealing is with an AMP so I’m not concerned about a little bit more working of the brass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CK1.0
#40
So, for those who use mandrels and for those that don't.....how do you verify what you have in resulting neck I.D.?

I ask...and please understand that I'm really a novice metallic reloader....but for those who buy (for example) a .002 under bore diameter mandrel, after you run it how do you know what you have.

In my very limited experience, I was was quite surprised by the degree of spring back I encountered and I had to go to larger than anticipated mandrels to get the .002 interference fit I was aiming for. This was once fired Lapua 6.5 CM case from Berger ammo that was annealed with an AMP.

I used pin gauges to check. Hey, it occupies my retired time and keeps me off of the street! hahah

Of course there is always the true thought that if the ammo shoots well then who gives a fuck. LOL
 
#41
Baron23 said:
So, for those who use mandrels and for those that don't.....how do you verify what you have in resulting neck I.D.?

I ask...and please understand that I'm really a novice metallic reloader....but for those who buy (for example) a .002 under bore diameter mandrel, after you run it how do you know what you have.

In my very limited experience, I was was quite surprised by the degree of spring back I encountered and I had to go to larger than anticipated mandrels to get the .002 interference fit I was aiming for. This was once fired Lapua 6.5 CM case from Berger ammo that was annealed with an AMP.

I used pin gauges to check. Hey, it occupies my retired time and keeps me off of the street! hahah

Of course there is always the true thought that if the ammo shoots well then who gives a fuck. LOL
Click to expand...

I’ve always thought of the obligatory/ubiquitous “2 thou of neck tension” as an arbitrary thing… most seem to base their calculations on something like neck OD more so than actual measured interference fit.

For me, I don’t have any pin gauges to measure the actual ID of the necks post-mandrel… I’ve just been using a .241” mandrel for long enough where I can feel a difference between what a .268” vs a .266” bushing feels like both when the mandrel is going in and out of the cases and when seating bullets…. in my case, if I had to guess, the interference fit would probably be more than 2 thou measured with a .241” pin gauge. Feels right, shoots right though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23 and Herb Stoner
#42
Baron23 said:
So, for those who use mandrels and for those that don't.....how do you verify what you have in resulting neck I.D.?
Click to expand...
To find my neck's ID, I measure the thickness of the neck with a ball micrometer, multiply that number by 2 and subtract that from my OD measurement. Otherwise, I measure the neck's OD before seating a bullet and then after seating and the difference tells me my "neck tension".
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp, Marine52, Baron23 and 1 other person
#43
Baron23 said:
So, for those who use mandrels and for those that don't.....how do you verify what you have in resulting neck I.D.?

I ask...and please understand that I'm really a novice metallic reloader....but for those who buy (for example) a .002 under bore diameter mandrel, after you run it how do you know what you have.

In my very limited experience, I was was quite surprised by the degree of spring back I encountered and I had to go to larger than anticipated mandrels to get the .002 interference fit I was aiming for. This was once fired Lapua 6.5 CM case from Berger ammo that was annealed with an AMP.

I used pin gauges to check. Hey, it occupies my retired time and keeps me off of the street! hahah

Of course there is always the true thought that if the ammo shoots well then who gives a fuck. LOL
Click to expand...
For me it’s less about the physical dimensions I’m left with, and what shows up on target. I use a .265” bushing and press a bullet in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23, Taylorbok and Schütze
#44
Tokay444 said:
View attachment 8149152
Click to expand...
This includes my first shot on a clean barrel, which I've logged as being up to 80fps slower than average. I could delete that 2798, but it is what it is.
I run my Magnetospeed on an MKM mount on my arca rail, so that it never touches my barrel. I have data on almost every shot that's left my barrel save for the ones in competition, and I quickly came to the realization that the mandrel was a waste of time at the bench for me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BuildingConceptsllc
#45
IF you are looking to get into neck mandrels, i would suggest pin gauges; sourced from any online tool company McMaster-Carr or SunCoast and a collet bullet puller, you can buy a set of pin gauges for $40.
You will need to grind the edge off of one end of the pin.
Conduct your testing to find which size shows the best results.
Once you find the desired next tension, (for that specific bullet) than consider getting a dedicated carbide mandrel.

In my case .30 cal i bought pins from 304 - 3075 in .0005 increments and conducted tests, some sizes were easy to eliminate others required additional testing. My best results where .002 under, and as luck would have it I had a carbide neck turning mandrels in the proper size.

Someone mentioned spring back, it is an important consideration, and is consistent across your (same lot) of brass. As a result we can eliminate it as a variable in testing.

The only additional consideration, I use an 8 sec count to expand each piece of brass.

Trevor
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp and Baron23
#46
IDK, for me it’s what shows up on target too, except I’ve experienced the opposite thing. Since adding the mandrel I’ve noticed much more consistency/repeatability shot-to-shot than I got previously when I was sizing bushing-only (expander ball removed). My ammo comes out the same level of awesome every time now without having to think about it, so when I suck, it’s me, there’s no blaming the ammo.

I don’t shoot as many shots over the chrono, as most of my practice is off obstacles, but I haven’t seen an SD that wasn’t a single-digit in over 2 years every time I’ve checked.

This is off a cattle gate and Shmedium, 750 yards, 6CM practice barrel way past its prime with a no BS 3000rds on it:

0976B7A1-7DAD-4C00-99CE-2D58950D831F.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp, stevieb92, FNG1001 and 3 others
#49
Are you seeing any velocity variance now that you’re @ 3000rds? That’s a pretty high count on a 6CM

Call it 4.5” with that top impact… 0.5-0.6 MOA off a cattle gate is great
 
#50
R_A_W said:
Are you seeing any velocity variance now that you’re @ 3000rds? That’s a pretty high count on a 6CM

Call it 4.5” with that top impact… 0.5-0.6 MOA off a cattle gate is great
Click to expand...

I’ve never run it faster than 2900fps and have always jumped ~.100” off, more so than anything else, I think that’s why the barrel has lasted so long.

Also, I didn’t clean the barrel with anything more aggressive than Bore Tech Eliminator, nylon brushes, and cotton patches for its first ~2200rds and thought it was dead…. But I brought it back to life with bronze brushes and Iosso and have been shooting it, still hammers.

I really didn’t know how to properly clean a barrel for the first 2200rds and have been more aggressive every 200-250rds since, now I let the borescope guide me.

I must be pushing it at this point and should retire it, but it’s still shooting… so I’m on the fence as to either pull it after hitting the range tomorrow, or keep going until it dies for real this time, IDK… I still haven’t experienced a speed drop-off yet, so who knows…
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevieb92, FNG1001 and R_A_W
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mjwilcox38
Concentricity Help on 6GT Brass
Replies
5
Views
181
918v
918v
W
Do you use expanding mandrels after a full-length bushing die for neck sizing?
Replies
151
Views
8K
Malum Prohibitum
Malum Prohibitum
7
25 creedmoor neck tension help
Replies
4
Views
556
sierracharlie338
sierracharlie338
J
Bullet seating with arbor press
Replies
6
Views
883
918v
918v
K
Options for getting custom carbide or nitrided mandrels
Replies
11
Views
572
KnowNothing256
K
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts