
Pregnant Florida woman uses AR-15 to fatally shoot armed intruder
Two armed men broke into the house and pistol whipped husband, before wife pulled out their legally possessed weapon and opened fire.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats a good woman right there![]()
Pregnant Florida woman uses AR-15 to fatally shoot armed intruder
Two armed men broke into the house and pistol whipped husband, before wife pulled out their legally possessed weapon and opened fire.www.google.com
We know how these things usually turn out, not so good..
Justice served at this level is in fact justice at its finest and need to worry about repeat offenders.
I've accepted the fact that she used an AR15, and appreciate it.Their won't be much coverage on this incident by the leftist media....accept the fact that an AR-15 was used.
I've accepted the fact that she used an AR15, and appreciate it.
I find it odd that they had to preface mentioning the homeowner's weapon with "legally possessed."
It's similar to when I see "fully-loaded." It's superfluous and irrelevant information designed to elicit an emotional response (I suppose). The load condition of a firearm is binary: Loaded vs unloaded. Whether the mag is topped off with one in the chamber or it's loaded with a single round does not change the status or lethality of the firearm.
The same is true with "legally possessed." Does it matter? If it was used in legitimate self-defense, that's pretty much all we need to know. I submit that the possession can be assumed "legal" unless it was ILLEGAL. If it was ILLEGALLY possessed, THEN maybe that information would add some value to the story.
But, otherwise, it's like saying, "He drove his legally possessed car with a current license to the store."
When they don't mention the race of the deceased attacker you know he wasn't white. The article would be titled 'unhinged middle aged white male gunned down!'
Saw the news report over the weekend was wondering how far it was from Wilbur.That happened just off 39 on the way down to the Shack.
Less than five miles from here.
I posted a response in the other thread about this.
Unnamed source said perps and victim may have known each other
Female empowerment at it's finest!
Funny you don't see the "Woke" SJW / Feminist / Communist / Democrats talking about women being empowered to protect themselves....
Almost like they want women to be victims & only have the right to kill their babies or make allegations.......
I've actually had that exact conversation with that exact type of person. They told me they were glad they didn't have a gun when they came home (where they live alone) while their house was being burglarized because they "might have killed the guy", and "if I had a gun at the time I would have used it". I shit you fucking not. They basically said they would rather be a victim because even being forced into situations of mortal survival is shameful. I can't think of a single thing I've ever heard which was more entitled and idiotic. They're lucky the dude ran and they didn't get fucking raped to death or kidnapped. It's pure naive entitlement, socio-political affluenza, and nothing about the OP fits their narrative. If anything they'd just come out against it and say "I'd rather be a victim".
I've actually had that exact conversation with that exact type of person. They told me they were glad they didn't have a gun when they came home (where they live alone) while their house was being burglarized because they "might have killed the guy", and "if I had a gun at the time I would have used it". I shit you fucking not. They basically said they would rather be a victim because even being forced into situations of mortal survival is shameful. I can't think of a single thing I've ever heard which was more entitled and idiotic. They're lucky the dude ran and they didn't get fucking raped to death or kidnapped. It's pure naive entitlement, socio-political affluenza, and nothing about the OP fits their narrative. If anything they'd just come out against it and say "I'd rather be a victim".
Yes, the MSM perfected the art of 'filtering' and the use of 'code' words long ago...Subtle conditioning!
I will kill ALL that touch my wife or stepdaughter!
I will kill ALL that touch my wife or stepdaughter!
My wife's?
Rhetoric vs logic. They lose every time in a logical debate, so ‘they’ fall back on rhetoric. Feelings, emotion, appeals to irrational fear.I find it odd that they had to preface mentioning the homeowner's weapon with "legally possessed."
It's similar to when I see "fully-loaded." It's superfluous and irrelevant information designed to elicit an emotional response (I suppose). The load condition of a firearm is binary: Loaded vs unloaded. Whether the mag is topped off with one in the chamber or it's loaded with a single round does not change the status or lethality of the firearm.
The same is true with "legally possessed." Does it matter? If it was used in legitimate self-defense, that's pretty much all we need to know. I submit that the possession can be assumed "legal" unless it was ILLEGAL. If it was ILLEGALLY possessed, THEN maybe that information would add some value to the story.
But, otherwise, it's like saying, "He drove his legally possessed car with a current license to the store."