Ok, so I have a budget of $2K for a scope. What should I buy? The primary application of the scope will be for steel/paper targets out to 1,000 yards or less. In fact, about 95% of my shots at steel/paper targets will be under 600 yards. Precision (MOA groups) work is more of what I have in mind than just practical hit work.
I'll employ the scope in hunts for varmint and deer, too. With this in mind, I'll probably have some shots under 100 yards. If I have a minimum power of at least 5, I think my field of view won't be too limited for this purpose.
I don't want the scope to have anything larger than a 50mm objective lens. A 56 mm would be too big in my opinion. Sure, it transmits more light and field of view is improved, however, bulky scopes aren't too aesthetic looking. And this is just my opinion.
As far as reticles go, I like dots and hash marks. The traditional duplex reticles are very limiting in relation to doping wind, etc. Illuminated reticles aren't my cup of tea either. Mil/mil or moa/moa? Still undecided in this arena of confusion. I've never used mils, but the comments on here suggest its easier to use than MOA.
Suggestions? Comments?
Thanks in advance.
I'll employ the scope in hunts for varmint and deer, too. With this in mind, I'll probably have some shots under 100 yards. If I have a minimum power of at least 5, I think my field of view won't be too limited for this purpose.
I don't want the scope to have anything larger than a 50mm objective lens. A 56 mm would be too big in my opinion. Sure, it transmits more light and field of view is improved, however, bulky scopes aren't too aesthetic looking. And this is just my opinion.
As far as reticles go, I like dots and hash marks. The traditional duplex reticles are very limiting in relation to doping wind, etc. Illuminated reticles aren't my cup of tea either. Mil/mil or moa/moa? Still undecided in this arena of confusion. I've never used mils, but the comments on here suggest its easier to use than MOA.
Suggestions? Comments?
Thanks in advance.