Re: Help me choose IOR 4x14 or Leupold 4x14
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: KYpatriot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Scott at Liberty recommended the Mk4 to me over the IOR - I had the ame question. I really like the TMR reticle. I did a track test on it since I was concerned about the QC issues others have mentioned with Leupold.
The scope tracked perfectly in 1/4 moa clicks across the full range of elevation adjustment, and returned to zero after several full range adjustments. The reticle subtended correctly, it ranges at full power (14x). It did not have any reticle cant. Now maybe I just got lucky, but this scope is everything it is supposed to be so far at least. The glass is not as good as a Zeiss hunting scope I have used, but if I had to choose I would of course be more concerned with repeatibility which the Mk4 I have has demonstrated so far. Talk to Scott - he is easy to buy from. </div></div>
I too recently purchased a Leupold MK4, though mine is a 6.5-20x. I agree with everything KY said above. Mine tracks true and holds/returns to zero. I love the TMR reticle and the glass compared favorably to the NF NXS 5.5-22x50mm I also looked at my local dealer. The only scope I looked through that I liked more than the MK4 was a Zeiss 6-24x56mm Diavari (I didn't look at S&B, USO, or Premier), but it was out of my price range. I've read little positive things about Leupold here, but my MK4 has exceeded my expectations so far and has been a great value for the $1,050 I paid.