House Dems Vote to Give Illegal Aliens Representation in Congress & Electoral College

[Redlion]

Just another ho hum act by the left. Treason anyone?

The House vote was 206 to 202 with 22 representatives 11 Democrats and 11 Republicans abstaining from the vote.
Steven Miller reported: “House Dems just voted UNANIMOUSLY to give illegals representation in Congress AND the Electoral College. House Seats and Electoral College votes WILL BE added to areas with the most illegals (including all Biden illegals) unless Senate passes the bill. Invasion by design.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...mocrats-vote-unanimously-give-illegal-aliens/

 

[abn31c]

I expect nothing less from the most corrupt government in the world.

 

[Jgore]

Is that what their constituents really want? Or do they not care what their voters want?

 

[Redlion]

Is that what their constituents really want? Or do they not care what their voters want?

I was pondering the same thing. Brazen enough to wake anyone up?

 

[abn31c]

It's all about money and the promise of a seat at the table. Their masters will toss them aside as soon as they achieve victory.

 

[weaselrunner]

Sure, why not. We're giving them everything else...

 

[mikehotel]

Well of course... how else is the potato going to get 91 million votes.

 

[theLBC]

Is that what their constituents really want? Or do they not care what their voters want?

democrats want to get their way, and they don't care how that happens.

 

[Jgore]

democrats want to get their way, and they don't care how that happens.

Ever since Obama it’s in your face. They don’t even try to hide it anymore.

 

[SilentStalkr]

I stood at the tree for over a year and nobody showed up so....no refunds.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Just my opinion of course but I'm not looking at it as a power play to sway the results of the upcoming election as much as I'm perceiving it as a marker for just how emboldened they now are that they're confident their seats are secure in spite of the upcoming election. Frankly, I find that scenario even more worrisome.

-LD

 

[Snipe260]

I stood at the tree for over a year and nobody showed up so....no refunds.

Bingo

 

[Doc68]

Well of course... how else is the potato going to get 91 million votes.

91.....those are rookie numbers.

They will say he got 500 million votes and people will believe it. That's how dumb most people are here these days.

Doc

 

[LuckyDuck]

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

And the republicants have the majority. They could have stopped this if they wanted to.
Now take a second look at desantis and Abbott sending them to Democrat run states and cities. They can gain enough democrat seats in the house to maintain a majority from now on.
Now you know why the founders put into the Constitution that senators were appointed by the States legislature and not popular vote. They could be easily removed.

 

[Hobo Hilton]

And the republicants have the majority. They could have stopped this if they wanted to.
Now take a second look at desantis and Abbott sending them to Democrat run states and cities. They can gain enough democrat seats in the house to maintain a majority from now on.
Now you know why the founders put into the Constitution that senators were appointed by the States legislature and not popular vote. They could be easily removed.

The process of Senators being appointed by the States legislature ended due to deadlocks and corruption. Similar to what is happening today in the congress.

The Constitution granted state legislatures the power to elect United States senators. Supporters of the Constitution argued that this method of election would strengthen the states' ties to the national government and insulate senators from shifting public opinion. To further distance the Senate from democratic pressures, the framers of the Constitution also provided that only one-third of the Senate would stand for election every two years.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, electoral deadlocks in state legislatures along with growing public concern about corruption in Senate elections led to calls for reform. In 1912 Congress passed a constitutional amendment that provided for direct election of senators by the people of each state. The states ratified the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, and the first popular Senate elections were held in 1914.
In the case of a vacancy due to the death or resignation of a senator, the Constitution originally granted governors the power to appoint a replacement only if the legislature was not in session at the time of vacancy. With the change to direct popular election of senators, the Seventeenth Amendment allows governors, if empowered by state legislatures, to appoint a replacement and set a date for a special election to choose a successor to serve for the remainder of the term.
The Constitution provides that the Senate "shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members."

 

[Redlion]

Just my opinion of course but I'm not looking at it as a power play to sway the results of the upcoming election as much as I'm perceiving it as a marker for just how emboldened they now are that they're confident their seats are secure in spite of the upcoming election. Frankly, I find that scenario even more worrisome.

-LD

I agree.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

The process of Senators being appointed by the States legislature ended due to deadlocks and corruption. Similar to what is happening today in the congress.

The Constitution granted state legislatures the power to elect United States senators. Supporters of the Constitution argued that this method of election would strengthen the states' ties to the national government and insulate senators from shifting public opinion. To further distance the Senate from democratic pressures, the framers of the Constitution also provided that only one-third of the Senate would stand for election every two years.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, electoral deadlocks in state legislatures along with growing public concern about corruption in Senate elections led to calls for reform. In 1912 Congress passed a constitutional amendment that provided for direct election of senators by the people of each state. The states ratified the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, and the first popular Senate elections were held in 1914.
In the case of a vacancy due to the death or resignation of a senator, the Constitution originally granted governors the power to appoint a replacement only if the legislature was not in session at the time of vacancy. With the change to direct popular election of senators, the Seventeenth Amendment allows governors, if empowered by state legislatures, to appoint a replacement and set a date for a special election to choose a successor to serve for the remainder of the term.
The Constitution provides that the Senate "shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members."

Gridlock is the intended way our government is supposed to work. It was a good narrative to sway opinion.
Instead of fixing what was going on in the states (easier problem to solve) they fucked the Republic.
Every change that they have done to the original constitution was to grab more power for a centralized government and screw the people.

 

[MCHOG]

That is misleading. The bill that passed actually EXCLUDES non-citizens from being counted. It says it is

"To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all individuals."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text

The Dems did vote against it but it still passed.

 

[Milf Dots]

That is misleading. The bill that passed actually EXCLUDES non-citizens from being counted. It says it is

"To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all individuals."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text

The Dems did vote against it but it still passed.

The problem is, if it does NOT pass in the Senate, and it likely won't because Dems hate America and WANT Illegal Aliens to count, then existing law continues to allow the traitors in our gov't to count Illegal Aliens in the Census and use those numbers for Congressional representation and Billions of dollars to blue states and cities.

If we had a Supreme Court made up of a majority of Americans instead of politicians- they'd have ruled that Illegal Aliens must not be counted in the Census. SCOTUS has at least three left wing judicial activists- but only two real champions for America- Thomas and Alito.

Dems and Rinos are traitorous cunnies.

 

[Hobo Hilton]

The problem is, if it does NOT pass in the Senate, and it likely won't because Dems hate America and WANT Illegal Aliens to count, then existing law continues to allow the traitors in our gov't to count Illegal Aliens in the Census and use those numbers for Congressional representation and Billions of dollars to blue states and cities.

If we had a Supreme Court made up of a majority of Americans instead of politicians- they'd have ruled that Illegal Aliens must not be counted in the Census. SCOTUS has at least three left wing judicial activists- but only two real champions for America- Thomas and Alito.

Dems and Rinos are traitorous cunnies.

That's two Big "IF's" in your statement. All these if's are not working out for the Patriots.

The problem is, if it does NOT pass in the Senate, and it likely won't because Dems hate America and WANT Illegal Aliens to count, then existing law continues to allow the traitors in our gov't to count Illegal Aliens in the Census and use those numbers for Congressional representation and Billions of dollars to blue states and cities.

If we had a Supreme Court made up of a majority of Americans instead of politicians- they'd have ruled that Illegal Aliens must not be counted in the Census. SCOTUS has at least three left wing judicial activists- but only two real champions for America- Thomas and Alito.

Dems and Rinos are traitorous cunnies.

 

[oneshot86]

I expect nothing less from the most corrupt government in the world.

I don't even give 2 fucks anymore.

Let the ground games begin

 

[LuckyDuck]

I don't even give 2 fucks anymore.

Let the ground games begin

But 'we' don't have F-15's and nukes!

-LD

 

[UKDslayer]

Dems and Rinos are traitorous cunnies.

You mispellled that.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

That is misleading. The bill that passed actually EXCLUDES non-citizens from being counted. It says it is

"To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all individuals."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text

The Dems did vote against it but it still passed.

Who's verifying the citizenship?
How did the Patriot Act work out? How about the Great Society act? How about the trillion dollar inflation reduction act?
Do I need to list more?

 

[Hobo Hilton]

You mispellled that.

I did that to get your attention.
It wokred.

 

[Doc68]

But 'we' don't have F-15's and nukes!

-LD

Yeah, well the Taliban didn't either, but they sure held their own and won in Afghanistan.....there's a lot of us vets out here that after 20yrs and multiple deployments picked up certain skills from lessons learned over there.....

So let's just get this shit started.......I'm getting old.

Doc

 

[mosin46]

gonna start anyway. deep state could keep control in a vacuum. not with china and russia around and looking to hook up. and about three foreign armies recently imported. they think they can control those. they can't.

 

[Longshot231]