Purely a hypothetical discussion.
Let us say you, a rifle and a single ammunition (excluding the intricacies of barrel break-in, we will say you have finished your break-in procedure if you have one), given the shooter (you), any rifle, and any ONE ammunition combination, how would you evaluate that 3 piece combination for accuracy in one given atmospheric condition? We will exclude variable such as range estimation, wind reading, etc...
How would the intended role of the rifle effect your methods for evaluation?
Are you testing at one distance or multiple distances?
3, 5 or 10 round groups?
Do 10 round groups give a better reflection of the accuracy potential of the combination or simply allow for the errors of shooter fatigue?
How many groups?
Would you drop the best and worst groups for average? Would you drop only the worst group for an average? Why?
Cold bore/shooter tracking? If you have a first round shift, do you address your fundamentals or the rifle fit first?
Would you break your position between groups to better indicate how the rifle fit (or lack thereof) effects the accuracy of the TOTAL combination which includes yourself?
If suppressed, do you break/remount the suppressor between groups to establish the repeatability of the interface?
Excluding static IBRSA style competition, what is acceptable accuracy for your evaluation? 1/2MOA, 1MOA?
I ask this to critique my own method, which I typically will do the same on any heavy barreled rifle, where I don't suspect heat will adversely effect the outcome.
Five (5) round groups, first round being cold bore/shooter, averaged center to center, coming off the rifle between groups.
If suppressed, I would repeat the test, to include cold bore/shooter, to evaluate accuracy change as well as POI shift.
Why I use this method -
5 round groups - I believe that 3 rounds isn't enough to see the true ES of POI of a given combination, unless your ES is consistent from group to group
while 10 rounds is on the margin of inducing errors of shooter fatigue that normally wouldn't be present real world.
Making sure to include cold shooter/gun - in a true defense application, that is usually the most valuable round. I also find it a good indicator of the quality of the product of both your fundamentals as well as how your rifle is set up to you. I believe cold bore shift is a phenomena that is attributable to either poor fundamentals or rifle fit.
Exclude the largest group - depending on the tempo at which you shoot, even five (5) round groups can begin to induce fatigue. I will typically exclude the largest group ONLY if it is well outside what the other 4 groups printed.
Reevaluate suppressed - Suppressors effect harmonics and accuracy nodes. I retest to evaluate accuracy as well as to get a very good idea of shift. Though I should, I normally don't remount the suppressor for every group.
100 Yards only - Mainly due to time/fatigue. I also believe that, with all things being equal, the only factor I am NOT able to see by testing at greater ranges is velocity ES producing any vertical. All things being equal (hypothetical 0 FPS ES), 3/4MOA at 100 yards should produce 3/4MOA at any other range
I ask all of this because 95% of the time, if I find myself on a 100 yard range, I'm shooting pretty close to this course of fire for each rifle I have with me.
Am I, in an effort to objectively evaluate the ability of the total combination, taking the right approach?
Let us say you, a rifle and a single ammunition (excluding the intricacies of barrel break-in, we will say you have finished your break-in procedure if you have one), given the shooter (you), any rifle, and any ONE ammunition combination, how would you evaluate that 3 piece combination for accuracy in one given atmospheric condition? We will exclude variable such as range estimation, wind reading, etc...
How would the intended role of the rifle effect your methods for evaluation?
Are you testing at one distance or multiple distances?
3, 5 or 10 round groups?
Do 10 round groups give a better reflection of the accuracy potential of the combination or simply allow for the errors of shooter fatigue?
How many groups?
Would you drop the best and worst groups for average? Would you drop only the worst group for an average? Why?
Cold bore/shooter tracking? If you have a first round shift, do you address your fundamentals or the rifle fit first?
Would you break your position between groups to better indicate how the rifle fit (or lack thereof) effects the accuracy of the TOTAL combination which includes yourself?
If suppressed, do you break/remount the suppressor between groups to establish the repeatability of the interface?
Excluding static IBRSA style competition, what is acceptable accuracy for your evaluation? 1/2MOA, 1MOA?
I ask this to critique my own method, which I typically will do the same on any heavy barreled rifle, where I don't suspect heat will adversely effect the outcome.
Five (5) round groups, first round being cold bore/shooter, averaged center to center, coming off the rifle between groups.
If suppressed, I would repeat the test, to include cold bore/shooter, to evaluate accuracy change as well as POI shift.
Why I use this method -
5 round groups - I believe that 3 rounds isn't enough to see the true ES of POI of a given combination, unless your ES is consistent from group to group
while 10 rounds is on the margin of inducing errors of shooter fatigue that normally wouldn't be present real world.
Making sure to include cold shooter/gun - in a true defense application, that is usually the most valuable round. I also find it a good indicator of the quality of the product of both your fundamentals as well as how your rifle is set up to you. I believe cold bore shift is a phenomena that is attributable to either poor fundamentals or rifle fit.
Exclude the largest group - depending on the tempo at which you shoot, even five (5) round groups can begin to induce fatigue. I will typically exclude the largest group ONLY if it is well outside what the other 4 groups printed.
Reevaluate suppressed - Suppressors effect harmonics and accuracy nodes. I retest to evaluate accuracy as well as to get a very good idea of shift. Though I should, I normally don't remount the suppressor for every group.
100 Yards only - Mainly due to time/fatigue. I also believe that, with all things being equal, the only factor I am NOT able to see by testing at greater ranges is velocity ES producing any vertical. All things being equal (hypothetical 0 FPS ES), 3/4MOA at 100 yards should produce 3/4MOA at any other range
I ask all of this because 95% of the time, if I find myself on a 100 yard range, I'm shooting pretty close to this course of fire for each rifle I have with me.
Am I, in an effort to objectively evaluate the ability of the total combination, taking the right approach?