Well now it's illegal to criticize Israel, or even say that jews killed Jesus. This almost unbelievable. Almost.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeWhile I have often felt that the complaining of anti-semitism was overwrought at times, I see now that it was not. Israel has only wanted to be the nation that it is on the land that it has.
But the muslims simply will not allow it and seek their total destruction. "From the River to the Sea." It means the Hamas, et al, want to erase Israel and hebrews from existence. Pure and simple. There is no getting along. In fact, in the Koran, it says all those not of the nation of Islam are infidels. In another part, it says infidels must die.
Many is the muslim who finds honor dying in the name of Allah. And of course, we have heard of the reward of 72 virgins. Well, that has been updated. It is now one virgin with 72 gender identities.
All speech should be free speech good, bad, or indifferent
Never said I agreed with the proposed law, bro.Cool story Bro. What does any of that have to do with freedom of speech? This bill gives an NGO (The IHRA) the right to define what is considered hate speech for American citizens. It doesn't even have the sense to incorporate said definition into the text, it merely adopts it by reference. Which could mean IHRA can change it to whatever they like, and we'll be required to abide.
It never fails to amaze me, the length so called "freedom loving Americans" will go to suck the dick of a certain foreign state (under the guise of "preventing discrimination". FFS, The IHRA definition includes: "Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis." as an example. I compare my OWN government to nazi's, fuck if I'm going to let a foreign government off the hook.
Odd that if the house passed a similar law that banned criticizing our .gov, we would all immediately call it what it is (a violation of the 1A). But some seem to be fine with being told what they are ALLOWED to say about other governments.
While I have often felt that the complaining of anti-semitism was overwrought at times, I see now that it was not.
Never said I agreed with the proposed law, bro.
That's okay. I also am familiar with "who is it that you dare not criticize?"Oh? Guess I misinterpreted your implication.
That's okay. I also am familiar with "who is it that you dare not criticize?"
That being said, this law would be bad because it is deciding who you may or may not criticize. In the same breath, we still need to address the anti-semitism.
Especially the fake anti-semitism. At least half of the people being arrested at these terrorist camp-outs at universities are not even students. Ergo, paid troublemakers who may not even be there from hatred of jews but there just because it is a paying job. Someone else directs them there to help destabilize things.
Free speech is free speech. If they're being paid, fine, have them trespassed from the campus since they shouldn't be there. But until jews aren't massively over represented in positions of power and influence, no, I don't think we need to legally address anti-semitisim.That's okay. I also am familiar with "who is it that you dare not criticize?"
That being said, this law would be bad because it is deciding who you may or may not criticize. In the same breath, we still need to address the anti-semitism.
Especially the fake anti-semitism. At least half of the people being arrested at these terrorist camp-outs at universities are not even students. Ergo, paid troublemakers who may not even be there from hatred of jews but there just because it is a paying job. Someone else directs them there to help destabilize things.
And those retarded cunts on “The View”Except Oprah. We should shut that fat stupid leftist pedo-enabling twat the hell up!!
I don't think there is a way to legally address anti-semitism. I do think we need some units of the Ohio National Guard to do some clean-up, though.Free speech is free speech. If they're being paid, fine, have them trespassed from the campus since they shouldn't be there. But until jews aren't massively over represented in positions of power and influence, no, I don't think we need to legally address anti-semitisim.
I just can't wait till all those Palestinians end up in the EU. Oh the irony.Well that’s BS!
I like Israel and want them to vaporize every POS rocket-tossing made-up Palestinian and wouldn’t even mind if they ran a Merkava over the green tent libtard faggots on campuses across America.
But damned I’ll support any legislation that says we can’t criticize or make fun of or tell-jokes about Israel… the same as I’d rag on any other race, religion, minority group, retard, tranny, nationality or the fact that they are South Dakota Puppy Killers.
Here in America, we can take the piss out of anyone… under our Constitution!
So in that spirit? How do you fit 100 Israeli’s in a Volkswagen Beetle? Two in the front, two in the back. And 96 in the ashtray.
Shit… someone is probably on the way over to shoot my dog and burn some kids.
Sirhr
Because they’re special boys and girlsWhy is one culture above criticism?...
R
I don't think there is a way to legally address anti-semitism. I do think we need some units of the Ohio National Guard to do some clean-up, though.
Cool story Bro. What does any of that have to do with freedom of speech? This bill gives an NGO (The IHRA) the right to define what is considered hate speech for American citizens. It doesn't even have the sense to incorporate said definition into the text, it merely adopts it by reference. Which could mean IHRA can change it to whatever they like, and we'll be required to abide.
It never fails to amaze me, the length so called "freedom loving Americans" will go to suck the dick of a certain foreign state (under the guise of "preventing discrimination". FFS, The IHRA definition includes: "Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis." as an example. I compare my OWN government to nazi's, fuck if I'm going to let a foreign government off the hook.
Odd that if the house passed a similar law that banned criticizing our .gov, we would all immediately call it what it is (a violation of the 1A). But some seem to be fine with being told what they are ALLOWED to say about other governments.
Also true.I still say the biggest tragedy of Kent State was the tragic state of their marksmanship!
Pathetic!
And you guys rag on the popo for missing all the time.
Sirhr
Apparently, you're unfamiliar with the law regarding contempt of congress.
Fuck, I have nothing but contempt for those shit stains.