Brilliant engineering kid. If you have a dog, please send it to a new home immediately -
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't stop the signal!Knock knock
"Who's there?"
"Youre in a lot of trouble."
How about his web site?Wondering if I could get this kids business card...
The 2nd Amendment does not exist for hunting deer or even hogs.
Machine guns are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
This is the point of the 2nd Amendment, the Patriots had the same technology as the British.
The Patriots stood a chance of fighting the government, which prevents tyranny, and enables revolutionary war.
It's not some secret, they openly stated that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and Patriots.
And this tree of liberty is very, very thirsty. A full scale revolution in the USA is long overdue, and it is the solution to our biggest problems.
Not only is this young man in his right to build a rapid fire device, not a machine gun, he should have every right to build a full on machine gun as well.
Not for deer, not for feral hogs, but to stand up and fight against a tyrannical US federal government when it is necessary to defend our rights and freedoms.
This bootleg era larper is going down the same path that the CRS guy on youtube is currently on. How this guy thinks that attaching a trip lever (that contacts the carrier really damn close to where an actual M16 disconnect resides) to the selector is a good idea is beyond me. He might fall into that category as too smart for his own good. That's if he isn't just running an entrapment scheme for the alphabet soup.How about his web site?
I assume he/they hold all the appropriate licenses/registrations to play with stuff like this ... maybe or maybe not.
Will ATF try to say making printable drawings available is "distribution"?
Designs – Hoffman Tactical
hoffmantactical.com
When the 2nd A was written, the current firearm was a flintlock. The citizens had flintlocks and the military had flintlocks. Clearly, the 2nd A protects the right of the citizens to have the same firearms as the military.Machine guns are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
The 2nd Amendment does not exist for hunting deer or even hogs.
Machine guns are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
This is the point of the 2nd Amendment, the Patriots had the same technology as the British.
The Patriots stood a chance of fighting the government, which prevents tyranny, and enables revolutionary war.
It's not some secret, they openly stated that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and Patriots.
And this tree of liberty is very, very thirsty. A full scale revolution in the USA is long overdue, and it is the solution to our biggest problems.
Not only is this young man in his right to build a rapid fire device, not a machine gun, he should have every right to build a full on machine gun as well.
Not for deer, not for feral hogs, but to stand up and fight against a tyrannical US federal government when it is necessary to defend our rights and freedoms.
One thread you defend the ATF and feds and now you are saying we should have all this weaponry......The 2nd Amendment does not exist for hunting deer or even hogs.
Machine guns are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
This is the point of the 2nd Amendment, the Patriots had the same technology as the British.
The Patriots stood a chance of fighting the government, which prevents tyranny, and enables revolutionary war.
It's not some secret, they openly stated that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and Patriots.
And this tree of liberty is very, very thirsty. A full scale revolution in the USA is long overdue, and it is the solution to our biggest problems.
Not only is this young man in his right to build a rapid fire device, not a machine gun, he should have every right to build a full on machine gun as well.
Not for deer, not for feral hogs, but to stand up and fight against a tyrannical US federal government when it is necessary to defend our rights and freedoms.
HEY.The only people I’ve ever seen with living room furniture in their yard has been druggies.
I doubt this kid has an SOT. I guarantee his butthole is a virgin, just like FPS Russia.... back in the day.How about his web site?
I assume he/they hold all the appropriate licenses/registrations to play with stuff like this ... maybe or maybe not.
Will ATF try to say making printable drawings available is "distribution"?
Designs – Hoffman Tactical
hoffmantactical.com
Good afternoon there Mr. AIThe 2nd Amendment does not exist for hunting deer or even hogs.
Machine guns are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
This is the point of the 2nd Amendment, the Patriots had the same technology as the British.
The Patriots stood a chance of fighting the government, which prevents tyranny, and enables revolutionary war.
It's not some secret, they openly stated that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and Patriots.
And this tree of liberty is very, very thirsty. A full scale revolution in the USA is long overdue, and it is the solution to our biggest problems.
Not only is this young man in his right to build a rapid fire device, not a machine gun, he should have every right to build a full on machine gun as well.
Not for deer, not for feral hogs, but to stand up and fight against a tyrannical US federal government when it is necessary to defend our rights and freedoms.
The Kentucky and Pennsylvania rifles of the colonists were far more technologically advanced than the Brown Bess musket used by the British.When the 2nd A was written, the current firearm was a flintlock. The citizens had flintlocks and the military had flintlocks. Clearly, the 2nd A protects the right of the citizens to have the same firearms as the military.
Machine gunsF-15s are necessary to achieve peer-level martial parity with the government.
How many Abrams tanks or F15s did the taliban have?FIFY
We all lost our guns in boating accidents or gave them up to save the children.How many Abrams tanks or F15s did the taliban have?
The full weight of the US military, and several other countries were in a country smaller than Texas for over 20 years, yet still couldn't win.
What happens when you try to fight the most heavily armed population on the planet
Biden says F-15s and nukes.... but he might just be fucking senile.How many Abrams tanks or F15s did the taliban have?
The full weight of the US military, and several other countries were in a country smaller than Texas for over 20 years, yet still couldn't win.
What happens when you try to fight the most heavily armed population on the planet
How many Abrams tanks or F15s did the taliban have?
the airframe/aero dynamics is 60’s tech. The weapons engines and what not are modern.F-15s are circa 1972 technology
You guys really don't get out much I guess.F-15s are circa 1972 technology
the airframe/aero dynamics is 60’s tech. The weapons engines and what not are modern.
Joe saying F-15 just proves how far off he is.I'll rephrase my statement.
The F-15A went active right around 1972.
Of course the technology was 60s.
What everyone missed is, the 1972 reference was meant to convey we should have newer stuff if uncle Joey wants a fight.
Sheesh.
F17 Domestic Longhair ?Still waiting for joe to call it the “F15 Tomcat” or something like that.