• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

ReaperDriver

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Sep 5, 2009
    1,331
    167
    60
    Vegas Baby!
    For all you guys that have Quickload - is it worth the $$?

    I just went through an uber laborious load development process to find three load combos (3 bullets, 1 powder) that my rifle likes. 600+ bullets/primers and several pounds of powder later, I'm thinking there's got to be a quicker way to get there. Is the QL the answer?

    I realize that QL will not tell me the perfect load, I'm just trying to narrow down the range of components and charge weights I want to test and find a starting point CLOSE to what will end up working and then test around that narrower window. I find the reloading manuals to be completely useless for a goos starting point, as they are ultra conservative. I started with the new 6th ed Sierra manual and their listed MAX load was nowhere near where I ended up. So I wasted a crap load of components trying to find that perfect load. I have a couple of other powders and bullet combos that I want to try out, but I dread the process again if I don't have agood starting point.

    Is QL accurate enough to predict results with my chamber and barrel with all the various permutations of powder/bullets/etc? Just looking to see if the $150 is worth it. Thanks...
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    What did that experimenting cost...not only in bullets, primers, and powder, but in range time and barrel life? 600 bullets...$180 bucks. 600 primers...$25? 4 pounds of powder...$80?....25% of barrel life...$150 ? So...QL to get you to a OBT load...for this barrel and cartridge and many more for years...$165 for the program, and $50 (maybe) worth of components...looks like a win/win to me. JMHO
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    QL is worth the money IMO. Especially when you start experimenting with non standard COALs.
    Plus, QT is pretty helpful too.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    Ok, fair enough. How do you tell it to model your chamber though... since chamber dimension seems to have a big role in interior ballisitics and eventual muzzle velocity?
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ReaperDriver</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok, fair enough. <span style="font-weight: bold">How do you tell it to model your chamber though... </span>since chamber dimension seems to have a big role in interior ballisitics and eventual muzzle velocity? </div></div>

    Anyone? Bueller? For those of you who are QL guru's - will QL allow you to specify chamber dimensions or is it a generic chamber?
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ReaperDriver</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ReaperDriver</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok, fair enough. <span style="font-weight: bold">How do you tell it to model your chamber though... </span>since chamber dimension seems to have a big role in interior ballisitics and eventual muzzle velocity? </div></div>

    Anyone? Bueller? For those of you who are QL guru's - will QL allow you to specify chamber dimensions or is it a generic chamber? </div></div>


    Its more powerful then you think. Yes you can do all that and more.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    Chamber dimensions, per se, don't matter as much as the inside capacity of the case. You'll find a spot on the left side of the screen that specifies water capacity of the case. Measure your fired case capacity in grains of water and fill in that spot with a custom capacity. JMHO
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lovetsx</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So you fill the case with water then measure on a scale? </div></div>

    I always use water that has sat out for about a day.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    is this the way to tell the chamber size ?
    I have not gotten the chrono or the quickload yet should be here today
    would this be from fired brass add day old water then input the differance or the complete weight?
    Bill
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    Did not know this
    Thank You Former Naval Person

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: former naval person</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Chamber dimensions, per se, don't matter as much as the inside capacity of the case. You'll find a spot on the left side of the screen that specifies water capacity of the case. Measure your fired case capacity in grains of water and fill in that spot with a custom capacity. JMHO </div></div>
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    You can do a LOT of what if´s with QL.

    The secret reason why you should get Quikc Load is that it contains also Quick Target Unlimited.

    I dare to say that QL is worth´s it´s price solely because of QTU which is the best ballistics program available. Bar none.

    You get some radar data on popular military bullets with QTU plus you can use Lapua Radar data plus you can use Litz´s G7 values for about 150 different long range bullets.

    If you want to get serious about long range shooting you can save a lot of nerves and money with QL and QTU.

    To get the most out of it you need to be interested in playing with computers so do not buy it unless you plan on using it.

    The only thing it does not do is to take into consideration different primers. So a max load might be safe with a regular primer but not with a magnum primer.

    Use it as a guide but use your head too.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    Like mine also +1 to what everyone has said it is uberpowerful. Like how I found a German prefix.
    smile.gif
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I just went through an uber laborious load development process to find three load combos (3 bullets, 1 powder) that my rifle likes. 600+ bullets/primers and several pounds of powder later, I'm thinking there's got to be a quicker way to get there. Is the QL the answer?
    </div></div>

    IN one word YES
    Bro you could of paid for QL several times over and maybe found better load
    DO IT, DO it now
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    OK last question about QL, I promise. I was reading on another thread (lapua case capacity thread) that QL doesn't distinguish between different brass case capacities. Does it allow a manual entry for that if you do the H2O measurement? I ask because I've found case capacity to be a huge factor in measured velocities with the same charge weight.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes </div></div>
    cool, I guess Im going to have to order it this week.
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ReaperDriver</div><div class="ubbcode-body">OK last question about QL, I promise. I was reading on another thread (lapua case capacity thread) that QL doesn't distinguish between different brass case capacities. Does it allow a manual entry for that if you do the H2O measurement? I ask because I've found case capacity to be a huge factor in measured velocities with the same charge weight. </div></div>

    Yes
     
    Re: I'm trying to justify the $$ for Quickload

    Agreed saves a lot of range time
    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: former naval person</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What did that experimenting cost...not only in bullets, primers, and powder, but in range time and barrel life? 600 bullets...$180 bucks. 600 primers...$25? 4 pounds of powder...$80?....25% of barrel life...$150 ? So...QL to get you to a OBT load...for this barrel and cartridge and many more for years...$165 for the program, and $50 (maybe) worth of components...looks like a win/win to me. JMHO </div></div>