Rifle Scopes Leica Geovid HD vs Leica Geovid

hydro556

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Dec 1, 2007
2,742
5
53
STL, home of the Cardinals.
I am thinking of trying the HD version of the Geovids.


Has anyone used both? It appears there are a few differences other than the glass?

Is the glass appreciably superior to the standard model? Are they are as good as ANY glass offered by Leica?
 
Re: Leica Geovid HD vs Leica Geovid

I have a televid 62 apochromatic, which should be similar to HD, if not the same thing. APO glass basically prevents the light that enters the lens from diffracting, transmitting a truer color spectrum. Picture a color spectrum entering the lens in straight lines (like dark side of the moon). What exits should be the same straight lines of color without much diffraction. In other words, what comes in goes out without distortion or loss of light.

I cannot attest that the HD glass in the geovids is superb, only bc I never looked thru them. But if that glass is like that in my televid, you will be very happy with those binos.
 
Re: Leica Geovid HD vs Leica Geovid

I have the regular model. I was told by a Rep if you covered up the version or model number you were looking through, most could never tell the difference....
smirk.gif
 
Re: Leica Geovid HD vs Leica Geovid

I've never used the HDs, but have had the 10X Geovids for 4+ years now. I used them on an elk hunt this weekend... I am still amazed at how clear the damn things are even after all this time. I don't know how much the price difference is, but if it was significant, I wouldn't bother. I'm sure either way you'll be happy, I LOVE mine.
 
Re: Leica Geovid HD vs Leica Geovid

I have, if you used the non-HD's for a week in the field, then took a week off and then went and used the HD's for a week you'd never tell the difference. If you can swap back and forth between them right away in the same situation you can tell a difference easily. I'd be willing to bet that if you swapped off the in field every day (day 1 HD, day 2 non-HD) you wouldn't be able to tell either.

The rangefinder also works a bit better in full sun and in distance on the HD model but again it's not major.

That said they are not as good as ANY leica glass, no way they compare to the ultravid HD's optically, they are probably close to the ultravids. My geovid HD's are on par with my EL's in the center 50% of the field of view but the EL's were significantly better at the edges. The ultravid HD's I've compared my EL's to the ultravid HD's were optically better in the center 50% but the EL's again were slightly better at the edge.

Personally I think edge clarity is of little use to most in binoculars users unless you are using them tripod mounted. You naturally center the area of interest and even in general scanning the whole scene it's not a big deal because your focus is again toward the center of the image unless it's fixed in a tripod. If you are using them as a pair of bigeyes tripod mounted then it becomes a bigger issue.

That said, all of those upper end optics are amazing clarity and light gathering. I remember doing hours of comparisons between my EL's, geovid, geovid HD, Zeiss RF's etc. when I wanted rangefinding binoculars. There are minor differences but we get way too caught up in them. Pick up a $250 pair of binoculars and compare them sometime (which is still more than 90% of users spend on their binoculars) and you'll once again appreciate the whole spectrum of top optics and realize the minor nit picking is just not that important.