Re: Leupold Mark 4 M2 3.5-10x40mm ff or 6.5-20x50mm ff
I know haha i have a SN-3 on my .308 They are top notch and my favorite scope. I was almost leaning towards the 3.5-10 cause hell i don't have to save up money near as long. If i don't need FFP though it lowers the range of cost significantly.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Exhogflyer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well, being that varmints are little critters I would go with the higher mag.And I would NOT get a ffp as it's not needed.You can always laser-range them and an enlarging reticle is not what you'd want for a tiny target,Just my .02..... </div></div>
I was just about to ask that, i wasn't sure if i need FFP or not. I guess i don't. That considerably lowers the price of both then. Hell i can pick up a 6.5-20x50 for 1250$ or a 8.5-25x50 for 1400. The reason the 3.5-10x40mm is even in the discussion is cause i was thinking. Hell 50% of the time im not going to shoot past 500 yards. When i say varmint for around here im talking coyote/bobcat. So the 3.5-10x40mm is still in the mix.
Also trying to talk my dad in to splitting it with me 50/50. So i wouldn't have to wait as long. Cause i got my 5R stock from my .308 build and am in the process of ordering a barrel withing the next week or so. And the 2 barrels i've chosen are in stock at midway.