I'm interested in a new spotting scope and would prefer one with a Mil reticule..
At the moment, the "standard" in the class seems to the Leupold Mark 4...
Apart from the reticule, how does it differ from the same size Goldring??? As a tactical scope is it built tougher? Better optics? I am just trying work out what justifies the extra $500 price tag over the Goldring besides the reticule.
Also, how do the optics in the Mk4 compare to say a Swaro ATS 65 (none HD)or similar spec'd Kowa's, Pentax ect???
I'm looking for a new scope for long range shooting, and while a Mil reticule would be good, I am wondering if by buying the Mk4 I would be giving up much, if any, optical clarity to get it..
I would like to spot bullet holes as far out as reasonably possible with a scope in the 60mm opjective class...
Thanks in advance,
Peter
At the moment, the "standard" in the class seems to the Leupold Mark 4...
Apart from the reticule, how does it differ from the same size Goldring??? As a tactical scope is it built tougher? Better optics? I am just trying work out what justifies the extra $500 price tag over the Goldring besides the reticule.
Also, how do the optics in the Mk4 compare to say a Swaro ATS 65 (none HD)or similar spec'd Kowa's, Pentax ect???
I'm looking for a new scope for long range shooting, and while a Mil reticule would be good, I am wondering if by buying the Mk4 I would be giving up much, if any, optical clarity to get it..
I would like to spot bullet holes as far out as reasonably possible with a scope in the 60mm opjective class...
Thanks in advance,
Peter