Leupold Mark 5 5-25 or Nightforce NX8 4-32?

Rolltide

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 14, 2003
582
134
50
East Tennessee
www.rimfiretactical.com
I'm trying to decide on a scope for a lighter-weight ( 7.5 lbs ) 6.5 PRC.

I know I don't need a Leupold Mark 5 5-25 or a Nightforce NX8 4-32...but I want one of those two because a lot of my scopes serve as a hunting scope and later on as a stand-in on one of my NRL or PRS rifles.

Those two are on the lighter-weight end of the "tactical" scopes, which is how I decided to pick between them.

Can anyone give me some feedback if you have both of them or have had experiences with them?

Which would you choose to use on a hunting rifle?
 
I own them both. I bought the NightForce first, then the Leupold. I like the 35mm tube of the Leupold for gathering more light. IMHO, the glass in the Leupold is clearer. The Leupold reticle is easier for my old eyes to see as well. There are many opinions, but you asked and I provided.
 
I also have both and the MK5 is my go-to for NRL / PRS type matches and it has a cleaner reticle and better glass IMO. Weight is almost dead even with the NX8 being 1.4 oz lighter but on a hunting rifle with possible low light situations I would choose the MK5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
Used both. My dad has both nx8's, and I have a Mark 5 5-25 and 7-35.

The mark 5 has a much more forgiving eye box and better glass to my eye.

The 3-18 mark 5 gives up some quality with the ultra short design and tends to have a bit of CA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
I own them both. I bought the NightForce first, then the Leupold. I like the 35mm tube of the Leupold for gathering more light. IMHO, the glass in the Leupold is clearer. The Leupold reticle is easier for my old eyes to see as well. There are many opinions, but you asked and I provided.
Tube size has nothing to do with the amount of light that passes through.
Unless your scope is a nightvision model, they do not "gather" light.
 
Mk5 has better eyebox and turrets.
NX8 has better glass and FOV. I thought mk5 had some CA compared to almost none with nx8.
I like both the mil xt and PR2.
Illumination cost is silly on the mk5

Overall I’d grab the nx8. You don’t have to have it on 32x the entire time.
 
Mark 5 is a better overall scope, I think. NX8 does have a wider FOV, but Mark 5 is easier to get behind. Reticles are in the eye of the beholder, but I think Leupold did a very good job with PR1 and PR2. On the other hand, Mil-XT is a nice design as well. That's a personal preference.

ILya
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
I have both on hunting rifles with cleaner reticles (PR1 and Mil C). Tough toss up in my opinion, as both do certain things well. If low light is a factor for you, then I'd go 5HD. I feel it might give you a few extra minutes. In equal low light conditions such as dawn/dusk, the NX8 gets dark over 24x so the extra mag is useless (and the parallax with no numbers is annoying if I'm being picky). I also feel the 5HD is easier to get behind, but my eye gives the glass edge to the NF. If I were hiking the mountains in rough country I'd want the NF, no doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YotaEer and simonp