What would I get going with the Mark 6 3-18 that I would not get with the Mark 5 3.6-18?
Is the Mark 6 worth the extra money?
Is the Mark 6 worth the extra money?
Leupold Mark 5 vs Mark 6
- Thread starter Army of One
- Start date
You would get a lesser scope. The Mark 5 is what the Mark 6 should have been. Better in nearly every way.
Reread my post. The only benefit the Mark 6 has is that it’s a 30mm tube (if a 35mm tube would bother you.)
Correction: MK6 is a 34mm tube
Last edited:
The Mark 5 is the latest and greatest from Leupold currently and what we'd recommend as well.
https://cstactical.com/leupold-mark-5hd-3-6-18x44mm/
https://cstactical.com/leupold-mark-5hd-3-6-18x44mm/
Go Mark 5 not Mark 6. My Mark 6 had tracking issues and went back twice before I got rid of it. However I am running a Mark 5 5-25 and tracking has been spot on so far and seems to be holding. However the Mark 5 is a 35mm tube and really limits your mounting options.
MK 6 is a 34mm tube, not 30mm. I Agree with everything else said above.
It is? Huh. OP, Disregard my post. I would have lost a lot of money on that one.
I have both and the Mk5 is product improved version of the Mk6. While I have never had any issues with mine, there were more reports of the mk6's having some odd stuff going on than the newer stuff.
I have enjoyed both, the only thing I liked about a Mark 6 over a Mark 5HD was the MilDot reticle option. Both are solid, but the Mark5HD is solidlier.
Tons of useful information. I purchased the Mark 5HD yesterday.
So I guess the next question is... Is it worth getting a MK 5 to replace a MK6 that is working just fine?
ETA: O god ... I bumped a 2 year old thread sorry ... I am still thinking it is 2022 in my head lol
ETA: O god ... I bumped a 2 year old thread sorry ... I am still thinking it is 2022 in my head lol
Necro response but...
I have both and honestly, outside of my mk5 having a better set of turrets and recticle, I have no complaints about the mk6.
