Hunting & Fishing Light Boots or Trail Running / Cross Training Shoes

DirtyDave

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 8, 2011
835
4
Texas
How many guys hunt with Trail Running or Cross Training style shoes? Talking about fair weather hunting, No snow, maybe light rain, but mostly warm weather. I do a lot of walking/hiking when I hunt and I dont sit in a tree.
A few weeks ago on the Archery Deer opener it was damn hot out. I hunted the first part of the day in my regular hunting boots. They are comfortable but get hot in that kind of heat. Got back to the truck and ate lunch, hunted the rest of the day in my every day New Balance Running shoes. Way better for the heat. Cant beat the comfort, would like a bit more traction.
Looked at the Merrells at Cabelas. What other options are out there?
 
I used Merrell Moab and they are light and run cool, only thing is the plains have tons of cactus and punch though the sides. I now have a pair of Keen Siskiyou from Cabelas, they fit me great and are waterproof.
 
I began jogging when Forrest Gump did, I sold sneakers for 3 years, and my wife and I hiked to the bottom of the grand canyon and back within one day, on our honeymoon - oh, I was 6 weeks post-ACL surgery.

Here are a few thoughts.

Coolness comes from nylon fabric versus leather, and from lower top versus higher top.

Stability comes from higher top, "cup" sole, and firm sole. A steel piece in a boot helps give stability. A "cup" sole is a sole that is not totally below the foot, but curves up around the foot. A running shoe has no cup sole. A cross trainer has something of a cup usually at the heel, the outside, and maybe at the toe.

When you are hiking over rough terrain, and especially if you are carrying gear, a stable shoe helps prevent injury.

Also, when setting up a stance for shooting, you will benefit from more stability than a running shoe. Golfers, bowlers, and disc golfers actually prefer a shoe with some stability for their very specific motion. They don't want to be wobbling around.

The part of the shoe above the sole is the 'upper.' Running shoes have the nylon fabric upper to be flexible and cool. Cross-trainers usually are meant to be OK for some tennis, some hiking, some basketball - so they need a leather upper, which is more supportive than the nylon fabric of a running shoe, but they use a leather that is softer than a tennis shoe or a basketball shoe.

Also, the companies try to perforate the leather to be cooler- over the long run this makes the leather stretch out more easily. It is getting obvious that a cross-trainer is quite a compromise. I have run 4-5 miles in a pair, but it was much more of a burden than in running shoes. (I have run a marathon, also - in running shoes.)

There are trail-running shoes, but those are usually just a tough running shoe with no 'cup' to the sole. They have a rougher tread, exactly like an off-road tire versus a z-rated tire.

A boot is just awesome. A cooler boot is even more awesome. Look for boots with the nylon fabric worked into the design on the side, and on the tongue. A tongue can be leather or nylon fabric, or a combo of these.

There are army boots like this, plus hi-tek, a british hiking shoe company, is well-known for their classic hiking boot design with "mesh" / nylon fabric on the side.

So, you need to judge by terrain what you can get away with.

If you are hiking in any running shoe, to be cooler, new balance is probably the best thing going.

Nike has a line of shoes and garments called "ACG" all-conditions gear - my ACG boots and running shoes were not cool. The ACG running shoes were for cold, wet running days on decent surface, and ACG boots for light hiking.

Nike has had some great, stable mid-cut cross-trainers, that are not too hot - a best example might be the Nike Air Trainer SC II.

Another option would be a football or mid-cut baseball cleat with the nylon mesh fabric in the design. I play ultimate Frisbee in cleats all the time, so cleats are no unusual-feeling to me.

Finally, in my opinion, I stay more comfortable with two pairs of socks in my hiking boots. I think more air can circulate in all of that cotton. Others disagree about coolness and comfort of two-pairs versus one pair of socks. Some like wool, I guess because the wooli-ness allows more circulation.
 
Great info row111
I have been looking at a few options on line, but for boots or shoes, you are a fool to buy off the internet without trying them on first. (Unless you are replacing something you already know fits). Anyways, I went in to Sport Chalet last night and tried on the Merrell Moab Ventilator low tops and really liked them. Light and cool like a running shoe, but not as flimsy. Good stability and tread pattern.
I also tried the Teva Riva Mesh shoes and they were good too, but not as aggressive of a tread pattern.
I think I'm going with the Merrell Moab
 
Stability actually comes from the post of the shoe/boot, tall post bad, short post good. A boot or shoe with a tall post and lots of material around the foot and heel counter will be less stable or more stress on the ankle than a less built but low post shoe/boot.

A mid sole that protects from stone bruising on the bottom of the foot is required too especially with a running or light trail shoe. For shoes, I prefer open weave, no goretex, why, hiking through wet mud, cross a creek, etc, the open weave will allow the water to drain out as the foot moves plus it vents off foot sweat. With goretex, the shoe becomes a bucket and holds water in and around the foot like a bucket.

I would recommend a trail running shoe like the Velocity or LaSportive line over a street runner. I never been a light hiking boot/shoe fan, if I go this route, I would prefer a trail runner as they are lighter with just as much support, good ones with a short post like Vasque or LaSportiva better than a light hiker.

One of my favorite shoes is FiveTen guide tennies, been all over the world trekking and climbing. I would give their guide series a hard look. One of the best backcountry trekking shoe available.
 
I've worn Merrel Moab shoes all over South Africa on climbing trips, helping out on a farm, and general walking as well as an occasional 10 mile run (@ about 13k ft MSL. rough.). They came recommended from a soldier relative. When I got back to PA from that trip I continued wearing them on almost every groundhog and small game hunting trip until the weather cooled down and heavier footwear was required. For all practical purposes, they will do everything you need and keep you comfortable doing it. They would be ideal for archery season as well. The only down side is if you are going through thorny underbrush such as PA's famous multi-floral rose bushes you will wish you had something heavier. Aside from those, they are awesome. So my vote is to stick with a cross-trainer style shoe. Drink the Merrell cool-aid!
 
Bought the Merrel Moab Ventilators. I have been wearing them to work the last few days and have no complaints. Like them a lot. Heading out in the morning for Archery Deer.
 
For early season antelope and archery deer where the temps rarely drop below 45...I am wearing two light weight styles that really fit your description.

I started with the Nike SFB (Special Field Boot) and loved them enough that I bought a 2nd pair. VERY light weight and very comfortable but don't expect them to last 10 years. They are basically exactly like their "Nike Free" running shoes with a high top canvas collar.

nike-special-field-boot-desert-tan-sfb-329798_221_d-jpghei375wid500.png


I'm also running a pair of Under Armour Ops Trainers and they are equally as comfortable but require less of a break in period to conform to your feet. The sole is more durable than the Nike and the side walls feel like they are as well. The only issue I have is the tongue doesn't go down inside the shoe very far and I tend to end up with a lot more grass seeds and junk inside them.
The Nike are completely enclosed all the way to the top.

20130117-213841.jpg
 

Attachments

  • nike_sfb.jpg
    nike_sfb.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 29
  • 20130117-213841.jpg
    20130117-213841.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 29