Ok, I guess when I was new to the whole reloading biz, I wanted to dial everything in and spent a pretty penny on all the best stuff to extract absolute perfection out of my hand loads. Now with a bit of experience under my belt, I often ask the question, "Is this necessary?" when going about my business.
Which brings me to the subject of neck turning. I've purchased a number of different neck turners over the years (K&M, Sinclair, Hart, Redding) and have turned more cases than I care to count and in the end, I'm not sure that it was really worth all the time and money. I've tried turning as well as leaving cases unturned. After doing A/B testing between identical loads with one turned and the other not, I didn't notice any real difference in accuracy and was still able to extract MOA performance with good cases and a well constructed rifle in either case.
I do confess to owning tactical specific rifles that tend to have a bit more leeway when it comes to neck thicknesses (versus the benchrest crew with specific neck thickness specifications) and perhaps that I why the whole neck turning thing is seeming like it is all for not in my particular rifles. With brass being a fairly fluid material, I also believe that any high or low points tend to work themselves out after a firing or two when using an expander in your typical die. Zediker's books also seem to conclude that roundness is often best with the included expander in Type S like dies.
So what say you? Is neck turning essential or for the birds?
Which brings me to the subject of neck turning. I've purchased a number of different neck turners over the years (K&M, Sinclair, Hart, Redding) and have turned more cases than I care to count and in the end, I'm not sure that it was really worth all the time and money. I've tried turning as well as leaving cases unturned. After doing A/B testing between identical loads with one turned and the other not, I didn't notice any real difference in accuracy and was still able to extract MOA performance with good cases and a well constructed rifle in either case.
I do confess to owning tactical specific rifles that tend to have a bit more leeway when it comes to neck thicknesses (versus the benchrest crew with specific neck thickness specifications) and perhaps that I why the whole neck turning thing is seeming like it is all for not in my particular rifles. With brass being a fairly fluid material, I also believe that any high or low points tend to work themselves out after a firing or two when using an expander in your typical die. Zediker's books also seem to conclude that roundness is often best with the included expander in Type S like dies.
So what say you? Is neck turning essential or for the birds?