Rifle Scopes Lrhsi vs dmr2

[Baron85]

Looking to buy another scope and torn between the gap deal on the lrhsi of buying a used dmr2. I currently have and ERS and love it. I have a tikka 223 varmint that needs a scope and was planning on using it as a trainer and for some of the closer range matches. I would also use this scope for hunting.

I'm heavily leaning toward the lrhsi. Any reason not to?

 

[SageRatSafaris]

For hunting at low magnification, I would prefer the circle thing on the LRHS's G2H reticle. Plus, $800 + MUT seems like a smoking deal. User manual for LRHS.

 

[Glassaholic]

You can't beat that GAP deal for any scope in that price range right now. I've had both the DMR II and the LRTS (cousin of the LRHS) and I prefer the glass in the LRHS/LRTS better than the DMR II, it's that good, it's also quite a bit lighter than the DMR II and uses 30mm rings if that makes a difference. The DMR II is shorter and does have a slight magnification benefit, but if you look at the FOV numbers at the bottom end they are not as far off as you'd think with a 3.5x mag vs. 4.5x