Re: M&P 9mm Full or Compact?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kingfish609</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
What do you mean by "too small to be useful"? It's a gun right? Shoots the same 9mm as a full size? There's a reason compact guns are made, they are easier to conceal, that's their usefulness. Glock has a couple of models that are even smaller than an M&P Compact, do those guns also not qualify as "useful"? I hardly think that the S&W engineers teamed up with the marketing department to craft up this whacky idea of a gun smaller than full-size. It would hardly be a novel idea.
I don't see the relevance or insight such replies provide to the person posting this question. Perhaps I missed the point of your post entirely, but to me it reeks of the whole, "My .45 will kill you quicker than your 9mm" debate. Inexperienced anecdote.
</div></div>
I have small hands and I still don't find it comfortable to hold onto, even with extended basepads.
I do not own a Glock 26 for similar reasons. It's too small to be useful, and not in any way that aids so much to its concealability that I'm willing to give up a firm grip with all of my fingers simply for a shorter grip to conceal, especially in a thick, double stack gun that is a bitch to conceal anyway.
S&W fucked up and made the grip TOO short. It's just too much (or too little, depending on how you look at it) of a good thing. That is why I carry a Glock 19. Because the S&W M&P Compact is just too small, even for my tiny hands.
I love my M&P Pro and I wish I could comfortably use their compact platform for concealed carry. Unfortunately, the engineers got it all wrong and made a gun that is just too small.
The Glock 19 is the epitome of awesome when it comes to compact, concealed carry guns. It holds 16 rounds in a concealable package, it's lightweight, and it has a 4" barrel. If you know of any gun that compares to these features, I'm all ears.
The only other guns that I carry on a semi-regular basis are an H&K P7 or a 1911. Small is okay, but too small is useless as far as I'm concerned. S&W missed the mark by trying to bridge the gap between compact and subcompact.