My question is why the, “I know, I know.” I love my M1 Carbine, and anyone that mocks you for having a WWII vintage warhorse can pound sand.
There’s a good reason many folks horse-traded away their issued rifles for them during combat operations.
If somebody's mocking me for anything regarding the M1 Carbine, I completely missed it.
My comment is about doing a restoration of a historical artifact. It's often frowned on, and often rightly so.
My view is to only do so if all are in agreement that the particular rifle's collectible value is not at issue; and that the rifle is intended to be used. I want them all to be used, but I also have no problem with folks who deal with them as collectible commodities. Their guns, their choice.
I have done restorations in the past and they worked; they all look beautiful. But their collector value is negated by doing the restoration.
It's a choice, and it's irrevocable.
Indifferent accuracy, I believe, may stem from handloading. It's a quirky chambering, and handloads can often fail to both cycle the rifle and deliver accuracy; one or the other, but sometimes, not both.
The rifle in question was bought for $50 when the owner threw in the towel over cycling/accuracy. He had been handloading for the gun. The gun was brought to a gunsmith to figure out the problem. The Gunsmith/LGS owner handed the new Carbine owner two boxes of commercial loads and told him, "Shoot these. If you come back and don't want the gun, I'll give you $500 for it. If you do like it; you'll owe me for two boxes of ammo".
The gun functioned flawlessly.
I might buy one; but for now, no.
SWMBO is nix on new guns at the moment. Maybe acquiring/building three AR15's and an AR10 in the past year may have something to do with it. I
do have the Ruger PC Carbine 9mm to slake my thirst for a Carbine at the moment.
Greg