Re: M1A scope mount
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: OldTex</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Scouter19D</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thank goodness with the Sadlak, you don't have to remove to use iron sights. There's a channel located in the mount so it doesn't hinder that. ....... </div></div>
I can't see under mine. I just checked to be sure. The bell of the scope keeps me from seeing the front sight. Maybe I have an older model, or maybe the 50mm objective on the scope makes the difference. </div></div>
Way I figure it with mounts with see through channels under the scope a 44mm objective is roughly the cut off for bring the scope low and still being able to use the irons without the objective in the way. Otherwise you have to bump the ring height higher. I went with a USO having a 37mm. No problem seeing past that, but my scope is so low I have only 8 clicks of elevation before the rear sight hits the scope in the rear. Having the scope on there makes the irons about useless in any respect since I need a tool to drop my comb also. In an emergency, if you had tools, I'd say remove the scope for best results. But that isn't very fast to do in an emergency. So a little offset reddot might be in order if you wanted iron speed and a back-up to the scope. I'm not exactly worried about it. With a 1.8x low power setting I can set mighty wide and close using the scope, besides if a threat is any closer than that I've really failed. It isn't like the USO is going to catastrophically fail, but I'd be transitioning to my handgun anyway in a last ditch effort to save my ass. Sitting here in rural midwest, I'm not too concerned. Over yonder I'm pretty sure I'd have at least someone backing me up, so that's my .02 on that.