Magnetospeed Sporter and 22LR

021411

hot loads B==D - - -
Full Member
Minuteman
Dec 14, 2011
1,819
1,924
Houston, TX
187FF59B-40DE-4127-8D8E-538D5F50CB36.jpeg
A2C7CCB7-712A-4B78-ACAB-E2EAF593A925.jpeg
57FCD62C-507C-4D2E-9AD2-6F695E0BCAFF.jpeg
I know this is old news to some but just wanted to reiterate that although the Sporter is labeled for centerfire use, it does work for 22LR once it is properly set up. I wanted something I could take to matches without breaking the bank. The V3 was highly considered but I didn’t need all the bells and whistles just for a quick pre match reading.
Use High 2 sensitivity setting and something like a Wiser mount for all the adjustments. I modded the bayonet a little and lopped off about 1/4” from the top. It gave me a little more adjustment.
Comparing it to my LabRadar this morning, the Sporter was anywhere from 1-8 fps faster in readings. I’m content with that. As far as read speed, it kept up as fast as I could cycle the bolt and torch off a round. It’s fine for $180.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: andybob and sparkyv
Is the bayonet different than the V3? I have no issues my V3 with .22 except needing to set the sensitivity very high. Do you believe the Lab Radar speed is more accurate than the Magnetospeed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 021411
Is the bayonet different than the V3? I have no issues my V3 with .22 except needing to set the sensitivity very high. Do you believe the Lab Radar speed is more accurate than the Magnetospeed?
Cosmetically for sure. Functionally I have no idea although I’ve read Sporters and V3 typically have the same accuracy. So maybe internals are the same??

As far as which is the accurate one I have no idea unless I compare it to another. I’m not sure 1-8 fps variance is going to make or break a shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jefe's Dope
I have done the same with my MagnetoSpeed Sporter - mounted on a bracket and cut 1/4" from the bayonet top. It is 100% reliable using Hi 2 sensitivity.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1490.jpg
    IMG_1490.jpg
    252.8 KB · Views: 119
  • IMG_1492.jpg
    IMG_1492.jpg
    280.8 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_1493.jpg
    IMG_1493.jpg
    277.7 KB · Views: 124