I'm sure this one has been beat to death and I will get several do a search ya lazy B&$!@%D, which I have but I'm sure I'm using the wrong terms and my search FU is weak today.
But anyway here goes.
I have a Remmy .308 in an A.I.C.S stock that I plan on shooting at 1-300 yards for the most part but have the chance from another member here to occasionally be able to shoot out to 1000 yards which I want to take him up on later down the road.
I have been looking at the Falcon Menace line of scopes and will be picking one up as soon as possible (that's all my budget allows right now I would do immoral and and possibly illegal things to buy the S&B but that's not an option so the Falcon line it is)
The 4-14-44 FFP Mil/Mil scope is out now and a couple places have them in stock and I could order one right now but part of me thinks I should wait to save a little more cash and spend it on the 5-25-50/56 FFP Mil/Mil when it comes out.
No the actually question comes down to what should I do here?
They both have pros and cons in my line of thinking but I defer to the experts here.
Back ground:
First long range rifle in about 15 years (38 now)so this will be pretty much all new to me (reloading will be coming in to it soon but that's a whole nother topic)
The reason for thinking the 5-25 would better serve me it can act as a spotting scope as well (one less expense for now that I can pick up later)
It's better to have the magnification and not need it than to need it and not have it. More precise on ranging as well.
The downside to the bigger scope is the objective will place the scope farther above the bore obviously so that is a factor.
The biggest con is it's not out yet but should be this month and I wanna shoot this thing in a bad way.
So there it is with out ALL the pros and cons just the biggies so please be gentle with me or not I just need a decent answer or reason to favor on over the other.
Thanks
Six
Pic of the rifle included if that helps. Pardon the reconstruction of the basement.
But anyway here goes.
I have a Remmy .308 in an A.I.C.S stock that I plan on shooting at 1-300 yards for the most part but have the chance from another member here to occasionally be able to shoot out to 1000 yards which I want to take him up on later down the road.
I have been looking at the Falcon Menace line of scopes and will be picking one up as soon as possible (that's all my budget allows right now I would do immoral and and possibly illegal things to buy the S&B but that's not an option so the Falcon line it is)
The 4-14-44 FFP Mil/Mil scope is out now and a couple places have them in stock and I could order one right now but part of me thinks I should wait to save a little more cash and spend it on the 5-25-50/56 FFP Mil/Mil when it comes out.
No the actually question comes down to what should I do here?
They both have pros and cons in my line of thinking but I defer to the experts here.
Back ground:
First long range rifle in about 15 years (38 now)so this will be pretty much all new to me (reloading will be coming in to it soon but that's a whole nother topic)
The reason for thinking the 5-25 would better serve me it can act as a spotting scope as well (one less expense for now that I can pick up later)
It's better to have the magnification and not need it than to need it and not have it. More precise on ranging as well.
The downside to the bigger scope is the objective will place the scope farther above the bore obviously so that is a factor.
The biggest con is it's not out yet but should be this month and I wanna shoot this thing in a bad way.
So there it is with out ALL the pros and cons just the biggies so please be gentle with me or not I just need a decent answer or reason to favor on over the other.
Thanks
Six
Pic of the rifle included if that helps. Pardon the reconstruction of the basement.