Hi,
I was just after some advice for a up coming build. I was thinking of building a 300 Norma and was wondering about the strength of these actions opposed to say a Stiller Tac338 .
I am wanting to build a lighter weight rifle around 14 pounds with a stainless barrel so I can rule out the Surgeon and the other big actions.
I have a few long action stocks and was thinking this may be a easier option. I have read about lug set back in 338 Lapua chambered actions and was wondering if I should be concerned in using the Mausingfield or Defiance.
I have heard of guys building on Remington's and guys opening up the boltface on a Stiller Tac300 but I am all for a superior safety margin. I just want the rifle to be safe and accurate.
I am not one to run stupid loads I am happy with a lower node that's super accurate.
I was just after some advice for a up coming build. I was thinking of building a 300 Norma and was wondering about the strength of these actions opposed to say a Stiller Tac338 .
I am wanting to build a lighter weight rifle around 14 pounds with a stainless barrel so I can rule out the Surgeon and the other big actions.
I have a few long action stocks and was thinking this may be a easier option. I have read about lug set back in 338 Lapua chambered actions and was wondering if I should be concerned in using the Mausingfield or Defiance.
I have heard of guys building on Remington's and guys opening up the boltface on a Stiller Tac300 but I am all for a superior safety margin. I just want the rifle to be safe and accurate.
I am not one to run stupid loads I am happy with a lower node that's super accurate.
Last edited: