Re: MI/Mil or MOA/MOA?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: m1a convert</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I found this post on another topic.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Realizing there are people heavily invested in the defense of one system over the other, I point out the mathematical advantages, and some simple exercises that to me substantiate my position.
I prefer MOA/MOA because I can do the math in the dirt with a stick if I have to. Mathematically it's easier.
Take this example: 60" target shows up as 8MOA.
60 x 100 = 6000
6000 / 8moa = 750y
No acceptance of rounding error, no calculator, fully half the math is done by just adding two zeros. A lot of the time you can do both the x and the / in your head.
The same exercise purely in MIL:
60 x 27.778 = 1666.68
1666.68 / 2.2MILs = 757Y
Even if we round the decimals off (which you don't have to do with MOA/MOA), 28x60 isn't a calculation that can be done nearly as easy.
Take the calculators & cell phones away and see who has the answer first.
Then see who can get the closest without taking their hands off the rifle, or their eye off the glass.
Where MOA/MOA gains the advantage in RE, it's often paid right back in scope knob design. a .25MOA per click knob is mighty easy to get lost in when you have to crank it three rotations to get to longer ranges.
This to me makes a zero stop absolutely essential on a MOA/MOA .25MOA per click scope, but a "desirable but not necessary" for the MIL/MIL guys.
Just my thoughts. I own and use both.
--Fargo007
</div></div>
Is there an advantage to using mils over moa as long as the knobs match the reticle? </div></div>
Actually the math used above is for IPHY not MOA. The multiplier for MOA is 95.5.
No advantage as long as you understand what your using.
Cheers,
Doc