• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

MKII TR worth it?

callen3615

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 27, 2010
100
13
36
Peidmont, NC
Ive got a MK II base model. Non accutrigger, tupperware stock, sporter barrel. I have done a trigger job and it shoots fine. Im just wondering if the TR is worth the 300 more dollars.

I paid around 100 at a wallmart for my mkii. My friend wants a bolt 22 like mine and im wondering if I should sell my 22 to him and get the TR. Or is it the same thing in a fancy stock?
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

I say get the cheap bull barrel fv plastic stock model, then buy a boyds $90 tacticool stock and a DIP one piece base for $40 and pocket the rest for ammo and shooting.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

+1 for that here is a pic of mine that I am currently building.
Custom shaped boyds stock.
Tactical bolt knob.
DIP bottom metal and trigger gaurd
IMG_3574.jpg
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sweetbeard</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have a Trr-sr and it is well worth the money. </div></div>

What do you plan on hanging off that thing? A tac light? Whats the purpose of the rails?
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What do you plan on hanging off that thing? A tac light? Whats the purpose of the rails?</div></div>

probably. lights are great on 22's as critter getters. or an IR laser for coons/possums/coyotes/whatevers
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300winman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">+1 for that here is a pic of mine that I am currently building.
Custom shaped boyds stock.
Tactical bolt knob.
DIP bottom metal and trigger gaurd
IMG_3574.jpg
</div></div>

Is yours the e receiver? did you have to do any fitting?
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

I have noticed issues with POI on the pencil barreled savage on the first few shots. Usually the first 1-4 are low, maybe a mil at 50 yards. It makes it hard to get headshots on squirrels when my POI changes every shot. I was hoping that the heavier barrel would help out with that, or will it be the same?
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sweetbeard</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have a Trr-sr and it is well worth the money. </div></div>

What do you plan on hanging off that thing? A tac light? Whats the purpose of the rails? </div></div>

I just like the way it looks.... rifle is sub moa at 100yds as well!

DSC06102.jpg
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

My plain ole mk-ll fv shoots dime size holes at50, off a harris bipod even with the twisty plastic stock and on a calm day will stay around 1-1.5" at100. This with a cheap Centerpoint @10x. My next upgrade willbe a Boyds target/hunter stock then some better glass. This with Wolf MT am going to try some Aguilla as I had good luck with it in my. Old jc higgins.
Eric
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?



All Savages are sub MOA at 100yds. All day long.[/quote] <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: armorpl8chikn</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> rifle is sub moa at 100yds as well!

</div></div>

Nice jab.

All Savages are sub MOA at 100yds. All day long.</div></div>
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

I absolutely love mine. I have two critter kills on it so far too, one at 30yds, the other at 75yds.

I have not had any issues with mine, nor with cbs's. Feel like I cant miss lol..... I want another one in fact.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: armorpl8chikn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just buy a CZ and you will know you bought a good rifle. </div></div>
If your just gonna be a CZ fanboy and make jabs at other brands of guns please go away. If you think nothing but a CZ is a good guy that is fine, but let others have there own thoughts and keep spending your money for pertty wood.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

Haven't really noticed any cold bore issues with my FV, when I shoot groups they're pretty consistant from start to end. Same goes with dot drills. If it is off, it's not so much that it looks like another group started.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the cold bore thing pisses me off though. Id pay for a rifle that shot consistently. </div></div>

In my experience cold bore flyers are mostly caused by poor bedding or stocks touching the barrel, or poor gun prep. It is not something your going to find be a brand reflected problem. Unless the brand is know to have poorly inlet stocks. Anyone looking for good accuracy or being a part of a place called "snipers hide" should be aware that most stock guns need work to perform as we would like them to. In my opinion. All guns are good.....with enough time and work put into them.
smile.gif
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body">its probably the bedding. Is there anyway to improve the bedding in the factory stock?</div></div>

The standard stock flexes way too much.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

The mkII fv that dicks sporting goods exclusively sells is not bad. OD stock and a fluted bull barrel for around 250. Mine is a tack driver and shoots more accurate than I am capable of...for now at least. You can always upgrade the stock too if you hate it.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ckfishdive</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone try CCI blazers? My friend swears by them for his 10/22 but i don't know for the FV.</div></div>

when are you guys going to realize that you should just try them... what my 22 loves, your's might hate... what mine hates, you're might love... or they might both love Fed. 711B...
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GotCox</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: armorpl8chikn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just buy a CZ and you will know you bought a good rifle. </div></div>
If your just gonna be a CZ fanboy and make jabs at other brands of guns please go away. If you think nothing but a CZ is a good guy that is fine, but let others have there own thoughts and keep spending your money for pertty wood. </div></div>
I think before you dismiss me scooter I will get you straight about a couple things. First of all I am not a CZ fanboy and have no brand affiliation whatsoever. I call a goddamned spade a spade no matter the situation. I don't make lame assed excuses about me doing my part. As to the jab hell I have been around here long enough I am starting to believe the best 22 rifle made today is a Savage. I do know better and you aren't the first feathers I have ruffled over their beloved Savage and you won't be the last.
You talk about your experience and I wonder just what that might be. Hell its the internet afterall. You might be 75 or 15 but if you think you are some white knight riding in to defend the defensless think again. Out of all the people that frequent the rimfire forum you thought you would set me straight after a stint of less than 30 days I guess some Savage fanboys can sleep better tonight knowing you are in their corner.
If you will do a little gravedigging, which I expect you already have, you will find that I have allowed that these rifles beat hell out of what I had to squirrel hunt with when I was a kid. BUT I have a bit better insight into what it takes to be an accurate 22 rifle and I have more than a handful of reference points to prove that fact. I have seen more than a few persons pour their money into one of these so called tactical trainers that Savage is producing and end up very disapointed taht it wasn't what they expected. Oh it looks the part but when the rubber meets the road most as a rule find out they got a tactical squirrel rifle.
For the record, right now, the best out of the box 22 trainer on the market is the Anschutz MPR....PERIOD! I have seen them put down the mightiest of custom rigs on a monthly basis. As far as CZ is concerned they give no quarter to all but the Anschutz. CZ is the BEST buy for the money on the market today. That is not idle chatter that is from REAL experience, not popping tin cans with the neighbor kids or punching paper at 50 and 100yds. All this has been hashed out more times in this section of Sniper's Hide more times than I care to count. About a year ago this sub MOA bullshit was laid to rest rather soundly but it seems to have picked up quite a bit of steam again. Few people have any idea what the hell a sub MOA 22 rifle IS let alone own one of these fantastical creatures. All 22's are sub MOA when you cherry pick groups and omit fliers as wind, not doing my part, etc ad nauseum.
I am a match director for CVRPC in Conover NC. We run a 22 TSC match every second Saturday March through October and often have between 30 and 40+ shooters bringing everything to the line from 100yr old Martinis to The cheapest Savage WalMart sells and everything in between. I KNOW what shoots and what doesn't. Our match is a brutal proving ground for accuracy from a 22 and the Savages have NEVER been up to the task often populating the bottom of the pack. Before you break out that other lame assed excuse, "its about the shooter not the gun", let me stop you. I will never argue that but David Tubb cannot win a match with a rifle that is not up to the task at hand. I will also be quick to tell you there have been a few stand out scores with a Savage at CVRPC but in 2 years there have been NO, NONE, NADA Savage that has ever won a match. We have some good shooters and they can drive a Savage to its full extent as proven by these token stand out scores. There was one match that a Savage/Anschutz won the match but anyone that knows anything knows those guns are not Savges at all simply Anschutz 64s that Savage imported and slapped on a piece of wood and a shitty trigger. They shoot just like an Anschutz 64....because they are. It was not my intention to rub anyone the wrong way but simply to speak the truth. The truth is something I will not back down from should every person here tell me to shut the hell up. There are bound to be a few great examples of Savage 22's out there but I have yet to actually be within rock throwing distance of one and I have been that close to a rather large sample at every 22TSC match. Think what you want. I am not here trying to make you think anything you don't want to think or make you shoot what you don't want to shoot. I will back up what I say with facts and if that hurts your feelings or anyone elses tough shit.
Here are the match reports if you would like to know how Savages really shoot otherwise keep living in your jaded little world.
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2390014#Post2390014

Don't think just because you are new you can wade in the deep end with no repercussions. Don't go whining to Lowlight or the mods about me attacking you either. You pulled the tiger's tail not me.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

touche armor. This thread wasn't about the CZ, but since it went there. It is a very accurate rimfire! My problem was that the wood was way to pretty, I would feel bad about tossing it around like my TR.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

Whew! hahaha well said. It is what it is. you might not win any matches with the savage but even you (armorpl8chikn)can't deny that Savage builds a pretty good rifle for the price, and you can't beat the aftermarket support. Sometimes hitting a tin can is good enough. I have a CZ and know damn well that it will out shoot any factory rifle, but I could have bought two savages for the cost of the CZ and I'd fair to say that two is always better than one. One also has to consider that (maybe) a CZ isn't in the budjet, or maybe capt obvious doesn't need a 1/2 moa gun to enjoy himself but wants a bit better than he has.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300winman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Whew! hahaha well said. It is what it is. you might not win any matches with the savage but even you (armorpl8chikn)can't deny that Savage builds a pretty good rifle for the price, and you can't beat the aftermarket support. Sometimes hitting a tin can is good enough. I have a CZ and know damn well that it will out shoot any factory rifle, but I could have bought two savages for the cost of the CZ and I'd fair to say that two is always better than one. One also has to consider that (maybe) a CZ isn't in the budjet, or maybe capt obvious doesn't need a 1/2 moa gun to enjoy himself but wants a bit better than he has. </div></div>
Winman it is certain you and I can see eye to eye on some things. You have read enough of my posts to know I don't mince words and I am fair in my critique of equipment.
True a CZ may not be in Mr. Obvious's budget and for that alone I will digress and say buy the best you can afford. I would rather have one great rifle than 2 good rifles, on that we may disagree but no matter. Any rifle is better than no rifle. I think you well understand I am not trying to shit on Obvious's thread but I can't stand the thought of someone being promised cheescake and end up with Entenman's Coffee Cake, delicious yes....but it ain't cheescake.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

I'm very pleased with my MKII TR.

As far as cold bore shots isn't this the case with rimfires in general? Mine shoots about 2" off center @ 100yds cold bore. Once I'm up and going it shoots 3/4 MOA @ 100yds consistently if I'm on my game. I haven't had the chance to shoot from a bench yet & I do get groups a little better/worse but it's rimfire ammo so we can't have it all. I would like to pillar bed my action but with around 1500 rounds through the rifle I feel the way I hold it influences my grouping the most. I also feel that I'm still learning to shoot the rifle well.

29ws9kx.jpg

<span style="text-decoration: underline">
Cost</span>
MKII TR: $405

MKII FV: $200-250
Boyd's stock: $105
Bottom metal/harware: $30

In the end you could save $20-70, but you won't have a larger bolt knob, matte fluted 22" barrel vs. 21" blued, and will have to take the time to locate the parts & install with the possibility of having to tweak the stock a bit to get it to fit right/floated properly. On top of that the Boyd's stock and bottom metal are often backordered or difficult to get.

Grab a TR, it's a very enjoyable rimfire rifle.
 
Re: MKII TR worth it?

armourpl8
The nice jab was just a poke. Though I drive a Savage, I know ther are far better rifles out there. I appreciate your sometimes brutal honestyand the info in this fimfire forum. I agree they are occasionally capable of MOA, but it is more like 1.5. But hey you shoot what you can afford util your ability outgrows your equipment. I too find it funny when some claim greatness from these entry level rifles, all day.
Eric