Range Report Muzzle Brake and Magnetospeed POI shift

FFAZ

SSgt
Minuteman
Apr 10, 2020
30
21
Utah
Not sure if this is the right section for this question, but heres the situation:

New .308 rifle, no brake. Did the break-in procedure and got a solid 100m zero although I knew I would still be doing a ladder test and some load development.

Once I finished break-in, I attached a muzzle brake since I knew I wouldnt be cleaning as much.

When I did my ladder test with the new brake and a magnetospeed attached, my POI was 6 inches high and 3 inches right. (I know both affect POI)

I started my test at the charge weight I did my break in at, and with the same cases, powder, and bullets.

Can my POI shift be THAT significant or is something else at play here?
 
I only loaded enough rounds for my ladder test so I didnt want to take it off and lose data points.

Could it have been the combination of the break-in, brake, and MS? It grouped well, just required an extreme adjustment
 
Before I put a whole lot of thought into it I would shoot it with the MS off and see were your point of impact is.

I'm loading up rounds for my refined load development so I'll do some with the MS off and see what happens. I didnt apply the new POI either, just dialed it and left it. I'll post later with results.
 
Muzzle break will almost surely change POI

They way I do load development I have my Magnetospeed on and am looking at speeds and ES Only and only shoot groups when that stage is done and don’t need the chrony info.

Most charge weights I tested would have amazing ES (between 3-7) and then ONE round would give me 40 FPS low and ruin my ES.

I was particular about everything from seating depth, sorting cases by weight, etc.

But I was lazy on primer depth/uniformity. I hope that's what it was, because if it is, I'm going to have a great gun
 
Most charge weights I tested would have amazing ES (between 3-7) and then ONE round would give me 40 FPS low and ruin my ES.

I was particular about everything from seating depth, sorting cases by weight, etc.

But I was lazy on primer depth/uniformity. I hope that's what it was, because if it is, I'm going to have a great gun
I would be surprised if primer seating depth would effect velocity that much, but, could be wrong.
 
Yea
I don’t bother with sorting or primer depth unless it’s proud of the base.
That one anomaly is probably telling you the truth more than the other shots.

I'm not one of those people who deletes the one flyer and claims that I have some low SD/ES. I'm always realistic and except a margin of error.

I'm just trying to figure out the cause behind those wierd drops in FPS
 
looking at speeds and ES Only

I was looking for the velocity flat spots to test those further...

Should I be looking for my lowest SDs instead?

My most consistent load had an ES of 3 but was slower than I want. 2578fps average, with 43.2gr of RL15

My sill was between 2655 and 2657 for 43.8gr and 44gr. BUT NOT the most consistent ES/SD wise
 
I was looking for the velocity flat spots to test those further...

Should I be looking for my lowest SDs instead?

My most consistent load had an ES of 3 but was slower than I want. 2578fps average, with 43.2gr of RL15

My sill was between 2655 and 2657 for 43.8gr and 44gr. BUT NOT the most consistent ES/SD wise
Your looking for velocity flat spots and/or ES flat spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFAZ
I'm not one of those people who deletes the one flyer and claims that I have some low SD/ES. I'm always realistic and except a margin of error.

I'm just trying to figure out the cause behind those wierd drops in FPS

Your powder charge weight + primer choice is the largest factor with velocity numbers.

It could also be something weird with seating pressure/neck tension if one is substantially tighter than the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFAZ