Take a look at this video. What are your thoughts on this ND specifically?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes the shooter knew that something went wrong but was he not aiming down range where targets were? was he not on the glass looking through the optic AT said targets?
I think he pulled his shot way earlier but he didn't sent a round in the wrong direction.
I think of a match were it was a timed event and the whole team had to have their shots off in a certain time. If you couldn't find the targets fast enough you just sent them down range at whatever you could find. Was this reason to be sent home? Shooting at the dirt as fast as you can because you screwed the pooch and lost your target through the scope and wanted your team to be able to make up the points. Or should you just burn up all the time by searching for the correct target?
Different opinion of what is the correct answer I imagine. I do agree however he should not have taken the point in no way shape or form. One thing I do appreciate about this sport and all shooting sports for the most part is people are honest. I would have said no call and I know I pulled the shot and not center punched it.
Hard to center punch it when you hold left edge ALL day.
Besides the growing number of questions in my head reference what should be done about ND's in general - this boils down to not knowing where that round went. The round was unaccounted for. It likely left the range all together. That's unacceptable.
I also believe that if an RO had actually been watching that he would have been stopped but for you guys that actually shoot matches the RO's are staring through glass the whole time and do not really see what is actually going on at the shooter level.
That's why there is so much "gaming" going on and why you have rifles falling off of props.
In the USPSA world rounds get sent down range a lot when they are not meant to but if you are actually pointing in the direction of the target how do you classify it as a true ND? Gun point in the right direction? yes Round go towards the target? yes Did the round fly over the berm? no Was the shooter actually ready to shoot? who knows....
We have velocity limits on our rifles to save steel; is it time to implement a minimum trigger weight for people safety?
Wtf are you talking about?This is the origin, in pure form, to Democrat politics, to a powerful central government, to gun control, to risk adverse CDRs in combat. Just so you all know what that well-intentioned logic looks like in the pure form - origin of thought.
With weapon properly cleared:
Put your finger on trigger as you would before a shot. Make sure your shoulder is in the position against the stock you would use for the most recoil management you’d ever use in a match.
Close eyes and take a bunch of very deep breathes with shoulder in contact with stock and finger on trigger.
Finger should NOT be on trigger until on target, PERIOD.
With weapon properly cleared, close bolt on empty chamber, safety off, and drop from 1-1.5ft on butt. If it goes off, fix/adjust trigger.
Wtf are you talking about?
Your answer is: you can't trust people, so we need to create a control measure that restricts their decision making, for their own safety. Where does that logic stop? People keep having NDs? Stop the matches. Guns are inherently dangerous (not just light triggers). Put a restriction on guns.
I can set a trigger tech diamond to 4oz and it will las a drop test.
Doesn’t make it safe with a shooter on it.
Ive already done all that.
Here's my message. Hold individuals accountable. Resist mass punishment. Don't get emotional about it. Ya, ADs/NDs can be dangerous, but we're already doing the right things, for the most part. Don't let yourself get carried away with the Lynch mob.
I would say the main culprit for ND's in our sport is simply getting in a hurry. However, all the NDs I've witnessed at matches, which is like two, was the exact same ND as the shooter in the video; hand brushed trigger guard a kaboom. I prefer a two stage trigger for this reason.
@regnar375 I agree with some of the things you're saying, but please don't be tempted to blame the range or the match director. They had nothing to do with it. The blame for this ND falls on the shooter alone. The stage was staffed by two RO's, one of whom is fairly experienced. I don't personally agree with the call to give the shooter that extra point, but I don't think it was her fault in any way. If she was on glass the whole time, then she did nothing wrong. The video is about the ND. I'd rather not start bashing the RO's in this case.
The RO was on glass the entire time. She Didn’t do anything wrong. Let’s keep this about the ND.The RO running the stage should be watching the shooters, period.
That dude’s weekend would have ended immediately.
Ignore him. He was telling people a Athlon Midas tac was as good as a Schmidt the other day.
He thinks safety rules are democratic control.
Hi,
I think everyone agrees there is a problem and shit....most even agree on what the solution is. The hurdle is implementing the solution.
Needed:
1. Range Officer: Monitors shooter, not targets.
2. Scorekeeper: Monitors target, not shooter.
3. MD: 1 million percent sides with RO on all safety calls. (If MD has reason to question RO then that person probably should not be RO)
Solution sounds super simple...until we realize there are not enough of Numbers 1 and 2 to go around for the number of matches being held.
So what does the industry/sport do to implement a solution is where the conversation should be heading...not whos fault a problem was/is.
Sincerely,
Theis
Anyone want to buy a 5x20 US PMII? $2800...
These MDs plan matches to create stress. Stress and guns with light triggers are a bad combo. This guy was wrong, and he got away with it. He should have owned up.
With all due respect-if you are gonna video yourself doing an op-Ed in front of a banner that implies you are an expert in the precision rifle community, and you are going to say that a match having the RO on glass and not on the shooter is OK, you sir are part of the problem.The RO was on glass the entire time. She Didn’t do anything wrong. Let’s keep this about the ND.
With all due respect-if you are gonna video yourself doing an op-Ed in front of a banner that implies you are an expert in the precision rifle community, and you are going to say that a match having the RO on glass and not on the shooter is OK, you sir are part of the problem.
ND’s will happen. Shooters will do unsafe movements. Gamers will cheat... These are facts.
RO’s and MD’s not immediately DQing people (either because of sponsor or clique status, or not wanting to hurt feelings) are why you are even talking about this.
This is not a new phenomenon, and is the exact reason many good shooters (myself included) left the sport.
We’re not shooting nerf guns, high velocity rifles kill-RO’s being there for scoring and not safety, and as this example showed-actually rewarding the behavior, is complete and utter bullshit.
With all due respect-if you are gonna video yourself doing an op-Ed in front of a banner that implies you are an expert in the precision rifle community, and you are going to say that a match having the RO on glass and not on the shooter is OK, you sir are part of the problem.
ND’s will happen. Shooters will do unsafe movements. Gamers will cheat... These are facts.
RO’s and MD’s not immediately DQing people (either because of sponsor or clique status, or not wanting to hurt feelings) are why you are even talking about this.
This is not a new phenomenon, and is the exact reason many good shooters (myself included) left the sport.
We’re not shooting nerf guns, high velocity rifles kill-RO’s being there for scoring and not safety, and as this example showed-actually rewarding the behavior, is complete and utter bullshit.