Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm, very interesting. What flavor of 6.5 will you be testing?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Hey man, where did you pick them up at? Let me know if the groups and consistency of these are on par with Berger Hybrid 140gr.
8 twist
Yea, keep this thread updated about it, this could be what beats down the Berger Hybrid. The only thing is you got guys on here that when they read the great results and it gets out, we want be able to find these any longer because of hoarding, Lol. I'm real interested, having a 6.5Lapua built right now and would love to pick up an advantage over the 140Hybrids since everyone is hoarding them up. I want to get 2,850 at least from the Bergers, so 2,750fps would be great with these. Past 800yd. you would start seeing a differents, and it would really make I're mid sized 6.5 sing at 1,500 and beyond!I just bang Steel and looking for 2725-2750 FPS, He said 8 twist will be fine, we shall see
I just bang Steel and looking for 2725-2750 FPS, He said 8 twist will be fine, we shall see
Hey, do you have any personal experience with varying barrel lengths in 6.5 cal. cartridges. I was wondering if having my barrel cut at 25in. instead of 27in. would prevent me from reaching that magic number of 2,850fps with a 6.5Lapua and 140gr Berger Hybrids, with H4350.
shit, down at the bottom of their page, they have a 160 with a .685 listed BC.[
That 160 has been out awile
Guys, you need to realize that the stated bc is called static bc. Most of Matrix bullets come in with way lass actual bc when tested. Just a friendly warning before you max out your credit cards!
Guys, you need to realize that the stated bc is called static bc. Most of Matrix bullets come in with way less actual bc when tested. Just a friendly warning before you max out your credit cards!
And bullydog, look at the bearing surface compared to a hybrid, a lot more. The Lapua case was designed with the 123 in mind, any weight gain in bullet drops the velocity fast.
JLK already makes one?
Guys, you need to realize that the stated bc is called static bc. Most of Matrix bullets come in with way less actual bc when tested. Just a friendly warning before you max out your credit cards!
And bullydog, look at the bearing surface compared to a hybrid, a lot more. The Lapua case was designed with the 123 in mind, any weight gain in bullet drops the velocity fast.
Hence why I stated, "listed BC..." Please see the research paper, "The Truth About Ballistic Coefficients" by Michael Courtney, PhD and Amy Courtney, PhD from the Ballistics Testing Group. A great read, regardless of this issue. I thought this information was rather banal in the precision rifle community.
Guys, you need to realize that the stated bc is called static bc. Most of Matrix bullets come in with way less actual bc when tested. Just a friendly warning before you max out your credit cards!
And bullydog, look at the bearing surface compared to a hybrid, a lot more. The Lapua case was designed with the 123 in mind, any weight gain in bullet drops the velocity fast.
Actually those BCs are confirmed my numerous LR shooters. & Not static.
shit, down at the bottom of their page, they have a 160 with a .685 listed BC.
Not happy with my oal on these at 2.865 my 140 JLK is 2.935 and 140 Berger VLD hunting is 2.895 and way out there 140 Berger BT LR 2.970.
any input on powder with heavier bullet in 260 been running RL-17 ? thanks
Not happy with my oal on these at 2.865 my 140 JLK is 2.935 and 140 Berger VLD hunting is 2.895 and way out there 140 Berger BT LR 2.970.
any input on powder with heavier bullet in 260 been running RL-17 ? thanks
Not happy with my oal on these at 2.865 my 140 JLK is 2.935 and 140 Berger VLD hunting is 2.895 and way out there 140 Berger BT LR 2.970.
any input on powder with heavier bullet in 260 been running RL-17 ? thanks
Does anyone have a recommendation on my barrel length for the 6.5 Lapua. The Smith is cutting it this week. I want to get 2,850fps with 140gr. bullets, without having pressure signs. I was going with 25in. plus my brake 2in. makes 27in. total. Plus, I was wanting to run a suppressor in the near future. A guy (I want name at the moment, he's working on a 6.5 Lapua proto type that's 6-6.5 in. long, depending on the final results), I know is making a precision use type can, and I'll tell you about it in the future. I just don't want to big of a stick. If I have to have 27in. or so I will, though. How short could I go and get 2,850fps with the Lapua???
Has anyone actually shot these 160's?
I should be able to push these in the 2950-3000 fps range and they appear to be slipperier than the 142's I've been shooting.
If that g1 is accurate it'd still be running 1300+ where I shoot to 1 mile.
Prob. wont test anymore @100 Next is 500 on paper, then 825 1000 and 1450 mostly on moa size steelTry some five shot groups to see how many will stray off or bunch together.
Thanks Milo, you stepping on toes all the time and running your fingers on the keyboard because you have nothing better to do is not nice for anybody including yourself. For your info Matrix shoots their bullets through electric targets to get BC just like the rest of the people, and Litz has done Matrix BC for them as well. As for the 296 all that was ever given was an estimated BC as nobody has shot the BC and I've been trying to get ahold of Litz and was going to personally pay for the BC tests. Sorry for the inconvenience Marshall.
I beg to differ with you here. I guess you're saying any old Joe Sixpack can determine what the bc of a bullet is? I guess my friend Ron and I should give Mr Ambrose a call with the findings we came up with regarding his new 198gr .296 caliber bullets, because in our test they came in far shy of what was predicted. As with 90% of the rest of them.
Idiot