Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@koshkin had said there was a 30mm tube Razor LH coming. One of those pictures on the rokslide link is mine that i grabbed from INstagram.
I have two of the original 1.5-8x32 HD LH scopes and I couldn't be happier with them.
ILya
Love the 1.5-8x. Got it on a 30-30 and it's great. Put a 2-10 LH on a bolt action .22. Both great little scopes.
What would make it better than the VX-5HD? I like my Razor HD LR but doesnt have illumination.Damn that would make my dream hunting scope.
I could give a crap about illumination as long as its SFP which I also prefer on a hunting scope. I hope these new Razors are SFP.What would make it better than the VX-5HD? I like my Razor HD LR but doesnt have illumination.
The Leupold is slightly heavier but does have illumination, slightly better fov, and locking/exposed turrets. I havent gotten behind a VX-5 but they seem to get decent reviews.
It may well not be. I'll admit to not having any experience with the VX-5. I'm somewhat of a vortex fanboy, but own plenty of older leupys that have all served me well. Hope they keep the weight down on this.What would make it better than the VX-5HD? I like my Razor HD LR but doesnt have illumination.
The Leupold is slightly heavier but does have illumination, slightly better fov, and locking/exposed turrets. I havent gotten behind a VX-5 but they seem to get decent reviews.
What would make it better than the VX-5HD? I like my Razor HD LR but doesnt have illumination.
The Leupold is slightly heavier but does have illumination, slightly better fov, and locking/exposed turrets. I havent gotten behind a VX-5 but they seem to get decent reviews.
There is one metric option that scopelist and eurooptic sells. it is the 3-18x50 with firedot fine duplex and mil turrets. I saw it on sale for 1100 yesterday and almost broke my wrist clicking the add to cart button so fast. Model number is 175835There was a special run of mil mil vx6 I saw somewhere a while back. Maybe optics planet.
There was a special run of mil mil vx6 I saw somewhere a while back. Maybe optics planet.
You might feel differently if you were using a .204 shooting tiny prairie dogs that play whack-a-mole, randomly appearing (and very quickly, I might add) 200-500 yards away. In the windstorm that is North/South Dakota/Wyoming.I have confirmation on the 30mm razor Lh and will have one for testing in 30 days or so from Vortex.
I’m currently running VX5 or VX6 on hunting rifles. Big fan of the CDS and the Duplex reticle. Kills on game out to 700 yards no problem. I personally see no need to have a messy reticle on a hunting rifle with modern range finders and the cds.
Have many Razor HD’s, Vipers etc. on other rifles and and happy with them.
I hope duplex is available on the new Razor LH!!
I have confirmation on the 30mm razor Lh and will have one for testing in 30 days or so from Vortex.
I’m currently running VX5 or VX6 on hunting rifles. Big fan of the CDS and the Duplex reticle. Kills on game out to 700 yards no problem. I personally see no need to have a messy reticle on a hunting rifle with modern range finders and the cds.
Have many Razor HD’s, Vipers etc. on other rifles and and happy with them.
I hope duplex is available on the new Razor LH!!
It better hold a candle to the LRHS/LRTS 3-12. IMO, those Bushnell offerings are the benchmark for the hunting scope that can hold its own in the shooter-hunter-LR world.
The LRHS 3-12 has been a staple on my on my 35whelen, and the LRHSi 4.5-18 has never been off my 6.5prc. Both are absolutely fantastic. All that being said, I'm anxious to see how a new razor lh would stack up.
It will be very interesting to see what reticles Vortex offers. The G3 from the LRHS is just fantastic.
Agree here. So far I haven’t seen anything at any price point that beats the 3-12 LRHS.
TT 3-15M obviously performs better but at larger size and weight. Reticles not as good as LRHS for hunting either.
March 3-24 is lighter but doesn’t have as useable of a reticle at 3x which is where I’m at most of time.
Agreed. Not that it matters but I think LRHS was the G2H (or M) right?
The basic problem is that Bushnell discontinued the LRHS and the reticle with the donut. I liked the LRHS, so when I was working on the Meopta reticles, I added a donut to the 3-18x50 to help with 3x visibility.
the lack of donut is why I still have multiple LRHS and not any LRTS. Thank you for pushing for the donut.
I would think it will be a SFP reticle to stay true to the LH hunting line. The AMG has the FFP covered. I hope I’m right on that.I would like to see an optic that's a smaller scale razor amg, say a 4-16x44 with locking elev turret, covered windage. FFP would be great but I doubt that'll happen. I think they could do this in the 21-23oz area as a razor g weighs 28oz.
The 1.5-8 and 2-10 have been there for months.
Can't wait for one of these. I'm a fan of most things about the Leupold lineup for hunting use 2 of them now. I do think clarity is better with the same $ on the vortex but Leupolds are usually a few ounces less. And man Leupold is missing the boat on a mil-mil scope in the VX5 or VX6 line.