Hi,
I am trying to compare the NP-R1 and MLR reticle in the Nightforce 5.5-22X. I am concerned with the line thickness, because most of what I do is shoot paper and other various targets.
According to NF's website, the NP-R1 has a line thickness of .062 MOA. I assume this is at max power even though they don't specify. In the same reticle document (see here) it shows the MLR as having a line thickness "at 22X" of .093 Mils. If my math is correct, that is approximately .320 MOA. That seems to be too thick. .335 MOA crosshairs would cover up a good portion of my .5 MOA targets that I like to use. Is this a typo in the NF Reticle Manual, or is it really that thick?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
I am trying to compare the NP-R1 and MLR reticle in the Nightforce 5.5-22X. I am concerned with the line thickness, because most of what I do is shoot paper and other various targets.
According to NF's website, the NP-R1 has a line thickness of .062 MOA. I assume this is at max power even though they don't specify. In the same reticle document (see here) it shows the MLR as having a line thickness "at 22X" of .093 Mils. If my math is correct, that is approximately .320 MOA. That seems to be too thick. .335 MOA crosshairs would cover up a good portion of my .5 MOA targets that I like to use. Is this a typo in the NF Reticle Manual, or is it really that thick?
Thanks in advance,
Mark