I know another this scope vs that scope question, but here we go.
My application is punching paper out to 1000 yds. Shooting F/TR with a .308. As far as I know I'll be shooting at static targets at known distances, I'm not planning to do a bunch of dialing.
I've pretty well made up my mind to get a NF 8-32x with an NP-2DD. The question for those who may have used both is which is the better choice for this application the BR with 1/8 MOA clicks or the NSX with 1/4?
I already though about the elevation limitations of the scopes, particularly the BR. The has 50 MOA, I need about 37 to get out to 1000. I've got a 20MOA base on the rifle now, so if we assume that the BR zeros somewhere w/i 25 to 30 off of the bottom on a flat base then I should have 40 to 45 MOA of elevation to get to 1000, gets me there with room to spare.
Anyone out there with a BR that can confirm or deny this assumption, though whatever it is I should be able to get a base to match and get the adjustment I need to reach 1000.
My application is punching paper out to 1000 yds. Shooting F/TR with a .308. As far as I know I'll be shooting at static targets at known distances, I'm not planning to do a bunch of dialing.
I've pretty well made up my mind to get a NF 8-32x with an NP-2DD. The question for those who may have used both is which is the better choice for this application the BR with 1/8 MOA clicks or the NSX with 1/4?
I already though about the elevation limitations of the scopes, particularly the BR. The has 50 MOA, I need about 37 to get out to 1000. I've got a 20MOA base on the rifle now, so if we assume that the BR zeros somewhere w/i 25 to 30 off of the bottom on a flat base then I should have 40 to 45 MOA of elevation to get to 1000, gets me there with room to spare.
Anyone out there with a BR that can confirm or deny this assumption, though whatever it is I should be able to get a base to match and get the adjustment I need to reach 1000.