The original post was 4/6/19.
Well, finally got to get my data together for the CZ lineup of rifles I have. I will summarize the report first then show all the data for view.
Only two types of ammo was used for this comparison. Thirty rounds each of CCI SV at 1070 fps advertised and CCI AR Tactical at 1200 fps as advertised. Same lot number was used in the SV test and the AR Tactical was all the same lot number. I have included the SD value also for those interested.
Four CZ 452 rifles were used, all having different barrel lengths.
Highest average velocity with the CCI SV is as follows.
1. 452 American TB Barrel length 17.25" --1093.6 fps
2. 452 American Barrel length 22.5" -------1086.5 fps
3. 452 Varmint Barrel length 21" ---------- 1085.3 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux Barrel length 28.75" ------1068.6 fps
So as it appears the lower velocity ammo is burning all its powder within the 17.25" barrel and anything longer "that I have" is only slowing it down. Now let's compare the high velocity AR Tactical ammo.
1. 452 Varmint at 1258.5 fps
2. 452 American at 1254.1 fps
3. 452 Amer TB at 1251.8 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux at 1249.9 fps
It appears the 21" barrel is optimized for this ammo.
Highest velocity average with both ammo together is.
1. 452 Varmint at 1174.6 fps
2. 452 Amer TB at 1172.7 fps
3. 452 American at 1170.3 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux at 1159.3 fps
So what have we learned?
1. A longer barrel length doesn't always mean a higher velocity.
2. The 21" barrel is optimal for the HV ammo.
3. The shorter 17.25" barrel is faster with both ammo than the longer 28.75" barrel. I am losing right at 1 fps for every inch in the Ultra lux barrel.
I have plenty of both ammo left. Next I will test both in my 10" barrel Anschutz Exemplar and my 10" TC Contender. It will be interesting to see where the velocity is between the two but more so with the 10" barrels compared to the Ultra Lux's 28.75" barrel.
Ok, here is the snip photos for each rifle.
More data coming soon.
Well, finally got to get my data together for the CZ lineup of rifles I have. I will summarize the report first then show all the data for view.
Only two types of ammo was used for this comparison. Thirty rounds each of CCI SV at 1070 fps advertised and CCI AR Tactical at 1200 fps as advertised. Same lot number was used in the SV test and the AR Tactical was all the same lot number. I have included the SD value also for those interested.
Four CZ 452 rifles were used, all having different barrel lengths.
Highest average velocity with the CCI SV is as follows.
1. 452 American TB Barrel length 17.25" --1093.6 fps
2. 452 American Barrel length 22.5" -------1086.5 fps
3. 452 Varmint Barrel length 21" ---------- 1085.3 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux Barrel length 28.75" ------1068.6 fps
So as it appears the lower velocity ammo is burning all its powder within the 17.25" barrel and anything longer "that I have" is only slowing it down. Now let's compare the high velocity AR Tactical ammo.
1. 452 Varmint at 1258.5 fps
2. 452 American at 1254.1 fps
3. 452 Amer TB at 1251.8 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux at 1249.9 fps
It appears the 21" barrel is optimized for this ammo.
Highest velocity average with both ammo together is.
1. 452 Varmint at 1174.6 fps
2. 452 Amer TB at 1172.7 fps
3. 452 American at 1170.3 fps
4. 452 Ultra Lux at 1159.3 fps
So what have we learned?
1. A longer barrel length doesn't always mean a higher velocity.
2. The 21" barrel is optimal for the HV ammo.
3. The shorter 17.25" barrel is faster with both ammo than the longer 28.75" barrel. I am losing right at 1 fps for every inch in the Ultra lux barrel.
I have plenty of both ammo left. Next I will test both in my 10" barrel Anschutz Exemplar and my 10" TC Contender. It will be interesting to see where the velocity is between the two but more so with the 10" barrels compared to the Ultra Lux's 28.75" barrel.
Ok, here is the snip photos for each rifle.
More data coming soon.