Re: palma contour advantages?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MTETM</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 18Echo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MTETM</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rath</div><div class="ubbcode-body">how do the palma contours compare with something like a Rem sendero/varmint?</div></div>
Here ya go...have a look at the contours and weights, pick the one you like...
http://www.kriegerbarrels.com/Contours-c1246-wp3382.htm
Personally, I have both and prefer the weight to length of the Medium Palma...and will continue to use them.
Is there a big advantage of one over the other...I don't think so...Is there an advantage over an MTU... Yeah, you don't have a truck axle on a rifle action
</div></div>
It looks like, according to my untrained eye and the graph, that a Standard Palma contour will fit in a Remington Varmint/Sendero barrel channel without modification?
Is this correct?</div></div>
Wild Bill has it correct. Most Palma tapers have a 5" shank before they begin to taper while the Rem. taper is usually 2.5 inches prior to the taper. This means you will have to open up the stock inlay close to the action and there will be a bit of a gap as you move toward the end of the stock because the Palma has more total taper to the barrel then the Remington Varmint.
Hope this makes sense. </div></div>
Okay. the Krieger countour page shows a 2.5 shank on the palma's thats why I was wondering.