I go where my budget allows for what I do. Camping and hunting, not a problem for Carhart, Duluth Trading, Under Armor cold gear line,
Got a camo jacket from Midway that is a little lighter than my Carhart, if need be. Danner boots and winter weight socks from Walmart. Some OR gloves, maybe a set of ski-gloves if its that cold. Maybe if I were to do the PRS, running and gunning stuff, the high speed $200 pants would be warranted. Best sign I saw was along the lines of, "Remember, your granddad hunted and killed all kinds of animals in blue jeans, a flannel shirt and work boots. The animals don't care how posh you look." Not a totally blanket statement, but I took my last deer I was pretty layered up with khaki BDU pants and an old 3-color desert Gore-Tex parka, and a RealTree beanie. The buck had other concerns.
Oh I hear you. Pretty much anything will work if that's what you got. I spent a lot of time in the field, long before goretex was a thing. Field jackets and rubber gumby suits were the norm. Did we get shit done? Hell yes (albeit, there were a lot more cases of frost bite). Would I rather do the same thing cloaked in Gore Tex, 600gram thinsulate boots, staying warm and dry? Yep.
Same goes for this. Will Carhartt or DT pants work? Well yeah, my knees won't get scraped up, and my dick won't be swinging in the breeze, scaring all the young ladies. But, the older I get, the less bullshit misery I am willing to endure if I don't have to. $200 for a pair of trousers that are comfortable, tailored to what I'm doing, doesn't seem like much when you compare it to the $3000-$8000 rigs (glass, rifle, bipod, RRS rail, bags, Kestrel, LRF, etc.) a lot of people run.
There's being hard (core), and then there is just being a rock. Don't be a rock.
As one Drill Instructor use to say to us recruits back in the day, "Girlscouts. You can leave here one of two ways. Smart. Or stroooonng. It's up to you." Buying the right equipment (which includes clothing) just seems smart to me...
Last edited: