This is probably a repost since its somewhat old news.. :
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ba0ed2371cc_story.html?utm_term=.537378ebef0c
Anyhow, I was wondering; why the use of a nerve agent? I'd reckon cause it wouldn't leave the radioactive trail that their previous assassination methods did... but its still such a unlikely method/difficult substance to obtain hence not providing any plausible deniability worth a damn... on top of obviously not being as lethal as one would assume they hoped..
Am I answering my own question? They wanted to send a strong message while avoiding the stronger backlash and consequences which would come with another Russia-sanctioned hit in Britain..??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ba0ed2371cc_story.html?utm_term=.537378ebef0c
Anyhow, I was wondering; why the use of a nerve agent? I'd reckon cause it wouldn't leave the radioactive trail that their previous assassination methods did... but its still such a unlikely method/difficult substance to obtain hence not providing any plausible deniability worth a damn... on top of obviously not being as lethal as one would assume they hoped..
Am I answering my own question? They wanted to send a strong message while avoiding the stronger backlash and consequences which would come with another Russia-sanctioned hit in Britain..??