Re: RCBS competition dies in a Forster co-ax???
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Clark</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SakoTRG FAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It wouldn't take me but 10 minutes to make one out of .100 thk A-2 heat treated tool steel if you thought it would make a bit of difference. I'm not worried about it so much for seating as much as i am during sizing. There is a heck of a lot of pressure on that .036" thk plate. A thicker harder plate would improve things a lot.
On the other hand i would hope that the engineers at Forster took that into account when they designed the press. It wouldn't make any sense to build a beauty of a machine just to save a couple of pennies on a simple to make piece of steel. John </div></div>
The wear plate is normally only used in compression.
The assembly you whipped up is using one in bending.
The Clarance Purdie 1965 patent on the co-ax press
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3345903.pdf
Went from Gopher Shooters Supply -> Bonanza -> Forster -> patent expired.
When ever I call or write Forster with improvements to the co-ax or the other major Purdie patent on seater dies:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3440923.pdf
I get kind words from the sweet female voices, but no follow up with the owners.
The tiny changes between the later Bonanza and the current Forster co-ax do some good and do some bad, but really insignificant.
What does it all mean?
I don't think the engineering staff at Forster is filling up the parking lot.
</div></div>
That's good to know! Basically i can make anything i want for a forster press, improvements or otherwise, and patent them myself
If you have any ideas I'd be happy to work something up if you wanna talk about them!!!