Re: Real difference beetween .223 and .22-250 @1k?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tomekeuro85</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks Guys,
My goal is to get something a step above .223 for long(er) range (my .223 is a 12 twist) but to minimize costs.
Basically if .22-250 isn't a significant improvement over the .223, id step it up to a 6mm or 6.5 round. Perhaps 6br? Just target shooting, no hunting. But if .22-250 does it then that's the winner. </div></div>
If minimizing cost is the issue, you must consider barrel life. The per-shot barrel cost can double the total cost of shooting. I'd avoid the 22-250 for this reason and look to larger calibers for the performance improvement you want. 6BR is a nice compromise with much better performance than 223REM and moderate total cost of shooting.
Any .22 caliber is not going to be ideal at 1K: performance-wise. But, the 223REM is very economical and can do well in calm conditions with a long barrel, fast twist and heavy match bullets. On a windy day, be prepared for your bullet to be blown completely off the target.