So I picked up my 110 FCP HS Precision 338 Lapua yesterday and I will say it's a very, very nice gun for $1200. However, the scope base on it is 0 MOA. Granted, I at least have a scope base for now, but why on earth would a company come to an educated conclusion that a rifle in this caliber wouldn't need a 20 MOA base? I would have rather paid $20 less for the gun than have an otherwise useless base. It's an EGW base and from the pictures I've seen of this gun pre-production, the base looked to be taller like the Farrell base and it definitely looked to be 20 MOA. Hell, even the place I bought it from said it was 20 MOA. I'm not going to send the gun back or anything, but does it make sense to anybody else as to why they would even bother putting that base on such a rifle?
Here is a link to the website, it's hard to tell if it has any MOA in it and maybe it looks like a 0 MOA, but that base is definitely not an EGW, it's a Farrell base. Mine has the picatinny all the way down it, no gap in the middle like what's pictured.
Savage Arms 110 FCP HS Precision
Here is a link to the website, it's hard to tell if it has any MOA in it and maybe it looks like a 0 MOA, but that base is definitely not an EGW, it's a Farrell base. Mine has the picatinny all the way down it, no gap in the middle like what's pictured.
Savage Arms 110 FCP HS Precision