Re: Remington selling refurbished military M24s
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wannashootit</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: predator3</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EODsix</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> In my opinion, you are correct, the barreled action is the rifle. Its been said that a buyer of these 25th anniversary M24s will get stocks that are painted and so on, finish wearing off various parts. I wouldn't buy one myself unless I could put my hands on it first to examine how worn out the other parts are. Scope condition, etc.
The fact that you're not getting the issue M24 receiver with the "US" property stamp sort of ruins it for me. Of course I wouldn't want a barrel that's had 12,000 rds through it so I'd prefer it to have a new barrel.
However Army armorers did not tinker or rework these weapons. That was one of the Army's specifications that it be an off the shelf, ready to shoot weapons system right out of the box. I think you must be referring to the USMC's M40A1/3/5 series of sniper rifles. They are custom built at Quantico not by Remington. </div></div>
There was no Army armorers that could service the M24. If the sniper couldnt fix it with parts in the deployment kit it had to ship to Remington. EOD is spot on. I had a burr on my boltface once. Kept peelling brass off the cartrage and jamming up the extractor and ejector. I would have been screwd. Sniper team 3 would have been out of business until it made it back from Remington. At the time I was 25th ID in Hawaii. Had some great friends from STA in K-bay on the other side off the island. We grabbed a military vehicle, the rifle and made a road trip to the Marine Base on the other side of the island. Met up with the STA Gunny, got walked to the armory building, he conducted the secret knock on the door, the slot window opened. I explained my rifle's illness and passed it off to the pair of eyeballs in the little window. A few hours later I was back in the shooting business. I still love Marines. </div></div>
Wow...no shit...
I know jack about how our military purchases, distributes and services it's weapon systems. But sure as hell seems ridiculous that the armorers could not service a 700 action? What would be the reasoning behind that?
Curious...
<span style="font-style: italic">IF</span>you had turned in your rifle, and it was shipped back to Remington for repair- what happens then? Would you get a replacement rifle "permanently", or a "loaner" (shitty term, but you get my point) until your rifle came back?
Howz all that work?
</div></div>
It's because the Army didn't have qualified personnel to do the work of master rifle builders like GAP or APA. Remington had real gun builders capable of quality work.
The Army has the USAMTU shop, but they build competition guns- they don't have enough personnel to service 6000 sniper rifles of three different types from the big army side alone. The AMTU shop is busy building competition pistols and rifles for the Army shooting team.
So when the guns go down, they were shipped to their manufacturer per the contract, and then fixed and returned. Typically the guys were taught to be careful with the guns and service between deployments if necessary.
On the M24- aside from some trigger issues, or a bad crown from field abuse, the guns typically don't go down in ways the shooter can't fix with the tool kit. Barrels wear out in 10K-20,000 rounds