Re: Ron Paul On Chris Kyle
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Intrepid4576</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">[/color]</span>
hes not spitting on anyone's grave - hes merely making an observation based off of his perception w/o letting emotion get involved <span style="font-weight: bold">[color:#CC0000]One cannot seperate emotion from an event with such bearing on those close with him or his family. Despite Paul's lack of emotion, it does not mean he shouldn't consider the emotion of those close. </span></span>- if you cannot do the same then you should not make any decisions <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">That is also a poor suggestion. Decisions affect people, no matter if you want them to or not. Emotions must be considered for any person in politics that is trying to influence opinion. </span></span>- and if you honestly cant think of a better way to treat a mental disorder than going to the shooting range with the patient .......<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">That is a common practice for treating PTSD, as it is the tool one used when getting the disorder. I was not aware you or Paul were experts on treatment of various forms of mental illness. This also assumes Kyle had all the "facts" now being reported by the media.</span></span>
paul voted against going to wars that chris kyle was part of - and was very vocal about getting out of them<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">And that gives Paul the freedom to be distasteful without public backlash? I don't think so.</span></span>
if this is what honestly infuriates you about our political leaders then i would venture to say that your perception is part of our countries larger problem<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">Paul is anything but a political leader. Leaders command respect, and give it. A leader recognizes that this is not the instance to preach. Just as Paul, with good reason, called out 0bama for politicizing Sandy Hook. Paul, however, is politicizing this murder. That makes the man a hypocrite----but we already knew he was a hypocrite as he frequently inserted pork for his district in popular spending bills he knew would pass, then "took the high ground" and voted against it; getting his cake and eating it to. He talks the talk, but fails to walk the walk.</span></span>
also paul is retired - not running again - is no longer in the public sector <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #CC0000">Paul is still writing books, giving speeches, and still has policy groups. He's far from removed from public life. Kyle, on the other hand, was no longer a soldier. Ironic that your defense of Paul is that he's not an elected official, somehow, excusing his behavior.</span></span>
</div></div>