SAGA Act... Protecting the Second Amendment!
- Thread starter sirhrmechanic
- Start date
Unnecessary posturing for the simps. 2nd Amendment is clear. SCOTUS has been clear in rulings the past 15 years. It is really a matter of "enforcing" the 2nd Amendment and punishing those that violate it.
That’s a bad slogan, we were told we could keep our plans, then we couldn’t.
Enforcement of 2A can be covered under the 'Vigilance Act' if that ever gets picked up and gets traction. People as a whole not caring about RKBA, falling ill to 'Fudd Syndrome', and willingly allowing gun rights to be legislated away are merely the symptoms of a much larger problem, and that is complacency and apathy. Putting the power back into the base level requires instilling a sense of civic duty in people to be INVOLVED in their communities' wellbeing and not 'trust the authorities to do it'.
No more dumb shit with a cute name introduced. Remove the unconstitutional laws, that’s all you need
The problem with that is that you have to take action *after* a law is in place. That means the law is almost always in effect until it's overturned.....and that's *if* it's overturned. And there's no real recourse if say you're in jail for a year and released when it's overturned.
It would be ideal if we could just say "nope, not doing that." Or there was some type of recourse after the fact.
A law like this would greatly reduce the need to "enforce" the 2a and saving a lot of time and money.
Sending the Federal Marshalls to arrest governors who sign Unconstitutional bills? For the denial of people's Civil RIghts!
Remember the definition of a Civil Right. It is everything in the Constitution and in the Bill of Rights.
I ask again... where the fuck is the ACLU? Oh, right... those communists are only for Civil Rights that push forward their socialist agenda.
The Second Amendment is a Civil Right. Any denial of that right is a Civil Rights violation. The Fed DoJ has used Civil Rights Violations against everyone from the Klan to Criminals. Hate Crimes are all "Civil Rights" violations under another form.
Well, hating Guns and Gun Owners and attempting to deprive them of their Civil Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a federal crime. Let's get a DoJ and a Marshalls Service that enforces illegal laws at the state level. You Sign it... You Pass it. You Introduce it... in any legislature or community... and you are guilty of a Civil Rights Violation.
Ask yourself this... what would the Fed do if Alabama once again said "We are re-introducing segregation." They would have the state covered in Federal agents in hours... and National Guard... and arrests.
Same should apply to 2A. Which is a Civil Right. By Definition. By Law.
Sirhr
It's a new law to follow the law?
We need less laws... not more.
We need less laws... not more.
"Shall not be infringed" is pretty fuckin clear.
Yup... it's the part about "Well-organized Militia" and "Arms" that the left parse endlessly to try and say that "Shall not be Infringed" only applies to organized armies and flintlocks... and doesn't apply to ammunition... etc, etc. etc. Blah Blah Blah.
We all know what the writers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights meant. And it was not about deer hunting. Or flintlocks. But the left looks to split words and apply whatever standard they can gin up in order to declare the 2A invlid.
Of course, the First Amendment (that they use to try and destroy the American Way of Life) applies to Telegraphs, Phones, Radios, Television, the Internet, satellite communications... yeah, all that. But the 2A applies to flintlocks only.
So you are spot on, Josh. But being right doesn't matter when faced with an organized and hugely-funded (in part by foreign powers and leftist billionaires) who have a tame media committed to disarming Americans... (just like they did with the Europeans, Canadians, Australians... etc.) before turning them into leftist sheep.
Being right protects noone against the forces of evil. And there's lots of that out there... and they are never going to quit. Fabian Socialism... It's how it's designed to work.
Pleasant thoughts!
Sirhr
Republicans don't have enough votes in the Senate to override a filibuster so this is just performative unless the Republicans are willing to rewrite the NFA on the grounds it's revenue related (the tax stamps for suppressors and SBR's) and then force it through with a simple majority on the grounds it's a budgetary change and can't be filibustered. I'm not sure the Republicans are willing to risk losing one of their biggest fundraisers (same reason why Democrats never fixed abortion) but maybe we will see...
Check the status of AR15 purchasing in Illinois...
Tell me about that SCOTUS stopping the shit...
Why doesn't this type of shit have to be qualified by SCOTUS before being foisted?...
R
Tell me about that SCOTUS stopping the shit...
Why doesn't this type of shit have to be qualified by SCOTUS before being foisted?...
R
SCOTUS is at best barely interested in the 2nd. They are currently deciding whether to grant Cert. to an Assault Weapons Ban case where the courts in Maryland ignored current law (Bruen) and told the SCOTUS to go fuck itself. And still we aren't sure if the SCOTUS is going to take up the case...
I'm going to mimic @wade2big .
Maybe we can get the "Just Doing My Job" retards to not enforce the bullshit unconstitutional garbage the politicians tell them to. Without enforcement it's meaningless paper. But y'all love that "Enforcement". Fucking hall monitors
Similar threads
