Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
are you set on either of the chassis? action wise the CTR is the same as the tac a1, but you would have other chassis options, and a lot of them
i looked hard at the tac a1 and was ready to pull the trigger, without even looking at the CTR to throw in something else. ended up getting a hancock...and then i got a tikka anyways and am throwing it in a krg xray this weekend
They are both very good rifles. The TRG is much more likely to shoot consistently 1/2 moa. The TRG has been around long enough that it is a very well known rifle. The Tikka T3X TAC A1 is fairly new and there are not a lot of them out their. So there is a bit of the cool factor on that but also a little risk that the newer model may not have all the kinks worked out.
I gotta ask how did you end up choosing between a chassis rifle and a more conventonally stocked rifle? Most shooters would make that decision (taking into account the intended use) then choose between more similar rifles.
If you were an expert on cars and someone asked you if they should get a Ford F-350 or a Corvette, you would probably have to determine how they intended to use the vehicle before you could know which was better suited for them. So what do you wish to achieve with this rifle.
That's a very good point. I'm not sure how chassis and stock affect accuracy (it would be great if someone can educate me on that). For me I love the look of a traditional stock, especially the look of the TRG 22 stock. But functionally I love the folding stock of the TAC A1, it's more compact and therefore more convenient if I want to occasionally use it to hunt. However, I try to avoid paying just for the look of a gun.
I wanted a trg22 until I priced the bipod and magazines. Jesus.
I'm not sure that a TRG-22 stock could be considered more or less accurate than a Chassis. The difference is that some people are more comfortable behind one or the other. Perhaps your answer is both and a hundred rounds of ammo for each so you can see what works for you.
I’d choose a TRG, You will not regret.
I have a trg22. It shoot 5 rounds 1 hole @100 yd every other time. I like the stock very much and bought a Tikka t3 sporter in 223 and shoot 1/4 moa during sight in. The sporter has almost same stock as trg except it is laminated wood. Love the ergo.
For the bipod, trg bipod cost an arm and a leg for me. But it is great. I also got a pictinny rail adaptor for both trg and t3 sporter. I can mount my gg&g and atlas bipod on either one. Cost $12 each.
For me, trg has much thicker/heavier barrel than t3. Still t3 give you best value for sub moa. To get to sub 1/2 moa, you will need to pay extra $1k. To get to 1/4 moa, you need to pay 2x the cost.
If $$$ is an issue, get tikka and a good scope. If you can save $1k and wait, get the trg22.
Why do people still buy the more expensive rifles? Is it about self esteem? ... But for guns the only purpose is accuracy isn't it?
Here's my question. I can shoot 1 moa consistently with a 500 buck savage 11 at 200 yards; a much more expensive 900 buck Tikka t3 compact precision rifle is functionally the same. By the same logic, a higher 1000 buck savage ashbury can consistently shoot 1/2 moa which is functionally the same as the 3000 buck tikka trg 22. Why do people still buy the more expensive rifles? Is it about self esteem? Some chiefs like to have really high end 1000 buck kitchen knives but those knives are functionally the same as a 200 buck good kitchen knives. But for guns the only purpose is accuracy isn't it?
I love the trg 22 but the last thing I want is to have a fancy heavy rifle that has the same accuracy as a budget savage rifle (let's say both rifles are handled by a great shooter not me).
No it's not just about accuracy. That's great that you can do so well with so little, it shows that you grasp the fundamentals of marksmanship but the idea that a $500 Savage will ever be able to keep pace with a TRG22 is amateur. Assuming the same skill level, a shooter running a TRG is going to have much better consistancy, he/she will be able to run the platform much faster and the reliability of TRG in adverse conditions is guaranteed, all within the stock configuration. Thats what you're paying for with all that extra money.
As a precision rifle instructor I see quite a few Savages come through my classes, in terms of accuracy they are typically ok but after 2-3 days, 90% of the guys running them are flustered, as the Savages just can't keep pace with the other platforms. They are not particually smooth actions, cheaper models are quite limited in magazine capacity and reliability. When adverse environmental conditions hit they are usally first to go down.
For a something around $1350-$1400 you can have a CTR dropped into a KRG Bravo and it will smoke the pants off off just about any Savage.
...and with a arguably better trigger. The TAC A1 is a great choice.or for $1500 you can have the Tac A1 and you'll have the same barrelled action in a folding chassis, with 3 magazines and TRG muzzle brake...
I might hunt occasionally. Do you think the 20'' barrel trg 22 is suitable for hunting?
Of those, TRG. If I was looking at TRG's however then I'd spend a few bucks more and get an AI AT.
Are you concerned about velocity or about the feel of front heavy rifle. In my opion the .308 out of 20" tube is great balance of ballistic performance and weight distribution. The barrel profile of the TRG should be close on something along the lines of a Remington Sendaro / Varmint contour (anyone who has one in hand correct me if I'm wrong) which I feel is reasonable for a long range hunting rig but as a brush gun you'll be disappointed.
or for $1500 you can have the Tac A1 and you'll have the same barrelled action in a folding chassis, with 3 magazines and TRG muzzle brake...
If thats your prerogative then you have your answers already.
Accuracy is cheap these days, fit and finish is not. I wouldnt normally call it self esteem in most cases, though there are plenty of gear queers out there, but confidence in your tools is of great benefit if for nothing more than peace of mind. Such as having it do what you want it to do without any fuss such as replacing a savage extractor when it inevitably fails on you because the ball bearing it rides on is too small. The tikka is nice but the TRG trigger is just that much nicer still.
or for $1500 you can have the Tac A1 and you'll have the same barrelled action in a folding chassis, with 3 magazines and TRG muzzle brake...
Yes, absolutely. But for paper/metal targets I’d take a 26" barrel. For comparison: a TRG with a 20" barrel weights 10,3 lbs, a TRG with a 26" barrel weights 10,8 lbs. Not a big difference.I might hunt occasionally. Do you think the 20'' barrel trg 22 is suitable for hunting?
Yes, absolutely. But for paper/metal targets I’d take a 26" barrel. For comparison: a TRG with a 20" barrel weights 10,3 lbs, a TRG with a 26" barrel weights 10,8 lbs. Not a big difference.
Man you seem to be all over the place in your wants if you are concerned about weight for a hunting rifle why are you even considering a TRG? There is no unicorn rifle that is perfect for both hunting and long range target shooting at the same time. Figure out which activity you will most use the rifle for and choose accordingly. If I was in your shoes I would probably get the TAC A1 over the TRG spend the extra money on the best glass I could afford.I was concerned about how bulky and heavey the rifle was. The Tikka Tac A1 with folding stock could be really convenient to carry around.
Man you seem to be all over the place in your wants if you are concerned about weight for a hunting rifle why are you even considering a TRG? There is no unicorn rifle that is perfect for both hunting and long range target shooting at the same time. Figure out which activity you will most use the rifle for and choose accordingly. If I was in your shoes I would probably get the TAC A1 over the TRG spend the extra money on the best glass I could afford.
Thanks for the advice. The reason why I even asked if trg 22 was suitable for hunting is that Mr. Silvan above suggested that I should choose trg 22 over tac a1 and he is a hunter, so I was curious about his opinion im trg 22 being an occasional hunting rifle. I did mention the word "occasional" which I thought would imply that hunting is not my primary activity. However, since I might go hunting someday in the future, it would be nice not having to buy a separate rifle for that occasional activity.
Another question about "there is no unicorn rifle that's perfect for both hunting and long range target shooting", It seems to me that the TAC A1 is very close to being a perfect rifle for both activities. What makes trg 22 superior than tac a1 in long range shooting? People say the two rifles shoot the same in terms of accuracy.
Yes, Sir, there are 2 options with 3 mm and 10 mm thickness.Thanks for the advice. By the way, is the trg 22 cheek piece ready to be adjusted or do I need to purchase some additional accessories? The official website has some really confusing information about this.
so I'm guessing you have never shot long distance nor have you hunted? sorry, that's the impression I'm getting...
short answer is no, the Tac A1 would not be remotely suitable for hunting. not any type of hunting I'm familiar with anyway.
if you want to go that route, get a CTR and buy a stock or chassis. Rudy suggested above the Bravo stock. I think that's your best bet right now as it gives you essentially one gun with two different personalities.
and by the way, if you are just starting out, I don't think you'll be able to exploit the accuracy difference between the TRG and Tac A1 or even the CTR in a Bravo stock. just my opinion...
Thanks for the information again, a CTR is definitely worth considering. My shooting has been limited to 200 yards at my local range (I live on long island and I have to drive to upstate if I wanna do long range shooting). I've never hunted before but I might try it someday in the future.
short answer is no, the Tac A1 would not be remotely suitable for hunting. not any type of hunting I'm familiar with anyway.
if you want to go that route, get a CTR ...
Is it the 2-stage trigger on the TAC A1 that has you ruling it out for hunting? or the weight? I only ask because those are the key functional differences between the CTR in a chassis and the TAC A1.
me personally, it's the weight. I like 2-stage triggers. I suppose if you were riding a 4-wheeler to a stand over a huge field somewhere I would be tempted to use the Tac A1 but 13+lbs of gun and scope is a whole lotta love if you got to carry it anywhere...
I own a TRG and an older Tikka M595 Master Sporter (Not T3) They are both beautiful rifles.
I *love* my TRG. It has the finest factory trigger I have ever felt. The balance is great, the stock is extremely comfortable and it is a laser.
If I had to choose between the two it would be the TRG. hands down.
Having said that there are some things to think about.
First the Sako accessories are very pricey. The bipod is fantastic but it is around $450.00.
The TRG is heavier to lug around.
If you want a 2 stage trigger go with the TRG.
If you are good with single stage go with the Tikka.
There are way more aftermarket accessories/chassis etc for the Tikka than the TRG.
Hope this helps.