i know this is kind of like comparing a honda to a maserati but hear me out! I'm planning out a 338 lapua build I'm going to start this summer. I've already decided to bite the bullet and go for a top end scope and a top end barrel and it go me thinking i might as well look into custom actions too. if i go the savage route ild buy a .338 donor rifle and try to sell off the barrel and stock and hopefully make a little money back. the advantage to this as far as i see it is that chassis systems are a lot easier to come by than for custom actions. other than getting the lugs lapped most people say there is no real need to get a savage action trued because of the floating bolt head. if i get the savage i also will hopefully do away with the "ugly" barrel nut and the barrel installed like a 700 and have a larger diameter breech. some stiller actions have the same footprint as a remington 700 but their 338 model is a touch wider and about half an inch longer so i would either have to go with a normal stock or find a chassis that has inlets available for it (XLR and Cadex as far as I've found). as i understand it stiller actions are essentially a trued 700 action thats beefed up a good bit. I'm not real crazy about the xlr chassis (just personal preference on looks) and the cadex chassis is awesome but limits my flexibility on scope bases (USO recommends a 30moa base) and costs near $2200.
i could go to the savage shooters forum and ask the same question but obviously i feel they would be pretty biased. I've always felt i could trust you folks here on the hide for an honest opinion. will i gain any real noticeable accuracy over the savage action? what would be the advantages of the stiller? thanks!
i could go to the savage shooters forum and ask the same question but obviously i feel they would be pretty biased. I've always felt i could trust you folks here on the hide for an honest opinion. will i gain any real noticeable accuracy over the savage action? what would be the advantages of the stiller? thanks!