Re: Scope rails for bolt action .308s
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SoCalPete</div><div class="ubbcode-body">probably won't get a stainless action.
Looking to either get a EGW aluminum one or a Seekins aluminum one. There is about a $45 price difference between the two. Have read threads that the EGW's are just fine so I may get both for a side by side comparison. As far as major differences I believe the Seekins has the recoil lug but EGW does not... Anything else? </div></div>
<span style="font-weight: bold">SoCalPete</span>,
I've never owned or used an EGW product so I do not have any practical experience with them. It doesn't mean shit, but having <span style="font-style: italic">seen</span> an EGW SA M700 base on a rifle I'll offer these observations: (a) While fit and finish seem OK, they aren't on par with a Seekins, (b) The EGW SA M700 base looks taller than a Seekins SA M700 base (lower is almost always preferred, but the myriad of different barrel contours, scopes, rings, and scope cover thicknesses might change this for you), and (c) the EGW base's "rails" have been machined-out, creating more pockets where dirt and grit can collect. Cleaning this crap out with a Q-Tip under the scope tube is not my idea of fun. The Seekins base has full rails so this is less of a "problem". And I don't know about the EGW base, but the Seekins base has an integrated recoil lug.
That said, the Seekins products are a known quantity where all aspects of the product are of the highest standard. Design, machining, fit & finish, and customer service. I'll take that over <span style="font-style: italic">"just fine"</span> any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Glen Seekins makes top notch products, has great customer service, and backs his products 100%. If you ever have any problems Glen will make it right.
Thats' not to say that EGW won't - like I said I don't have any practical experience with EGW. However, as I said above, <span style="font-style: italic">the Seekins products are a known quantity</span>. And that, my friend, is worth paying for.
Keith