Re: Short action vs long action 7wsm
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: USMCj</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: USMCj</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Downzero</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you're going to go long action, there are way more powerful cartridges than 7WSM.
7WSM is a sweet deal for a short action, but with the availablity of 7 RUM, 7 STW, etc., I just don't see the point of building a 7WSM long action. </div></div>
Come again? why would you run 7RM when the WSM gives you more than enough case capacity to push the hevies at over 3K fps? You need more powder in the RM or larger cases to push the 180's than you would in a WSM. </div></div>
He was talking about the RUM and STW which are much bigger then the RM.
I run my WSM in a short action with a Badger M5 and have my AICS mags modified with the front plate taken out. That gives me a maximum OAL length of 2.963. I just load it to 2.960 and run with that. Pretty standard setup. For some reason or another, in my gun, the the bullets (180gr Bergers/JLKs) don't care if it's seated in the lands or not. The other week I had a 5 shot group measuring well under a 1/2" at 300 yards. I don't know, I didn't bother to measure, all the holes were touching and I could only see 3 distinct holes. APA builds one hell of a rifle! </div></div>
I understand, but its a waste of powder as the WSM has more than enough capacity for powder to push any bullet you want at any speed. Some would even say that it has too much capacity. </div></div>
That is absurd. 7WSM is a good performing cartridge, but there are much better performing 7mm calibers than 7WSM. They may not have its efficiency, but they definitely offer better velocity and longer range.